Chevron Corporation v. Stratus Consulting, Inc. et al
| Chevron Corporation |
| Stratus Consulting, Inc., David J. Chapman, Douglas Beltman, Jennifer M.H. Peers, David M. Mills, Peter N. Jones, Laura Belanger and Ann S. Maest |
| 1:2010cv00047 |
| January 8, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| John L. Kane |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1782 Assistance to foreign & international tribunals & litigants |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
335
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 318 the Stratus Respondents' Motion for Payment of Production Expenses, and granting in part and denying in part 319 Petitioner Chevron Corporation's Motion to Reallocate Document Production Costs. The Interested Parties shall reimburse Chevron in the amount of $9,130.00. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 6/27/2011. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
302
MINUTE ORDER granting 298 Petitioner Chevron Corporation's Motion for Clarification, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11/23/2010. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
293
Courtroom Minutes/Minute Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Telephonic Motion Hearing held on 11/15/2010, granting in part and denying in part 275 Petitioner Chevron Corporation's Motion for Additional Time for the Depositions of Respondents Beltman and Maest; granting in part and denying in part 272 Stratus' and Ecuadorian Plaintiffs' Motion for Sanctions Against Petitioner Chevron Corporation; and denying 289 Stratus' Verified Motion for Order to Show Cause. (Court Reporter: Cathy Coomes)(FTR: Courtroom C-203) (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
268
MINUTE ORDER denying 263 the Ecuadorian Plaintiffs' Emergency Motion for a Stay Pending Appeal of and/or Objections to Order Granting Motion to Compel, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/5/2010. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
262
ORDER granting 232 Petitioner Chevron Corporation's Motion to Compel Production of All Responsive Documents Withheld. All documents responsive to the categories in the Section 1782 subpoenas issued by Judge Kane shall be produced by the Stratus respondents and the Ecuadorian Plaintiffs to Petitioner on or before 10/5/2010. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/1/2010. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
228
ORDER granting 193 Petitioner Chevron's Motion to Compel, and Respondents shall complete re-production of electronically stored documents already produced within fourteen days of this order; denying 205 Petitioner Chevron's Emergency Mo tion for Expedited Order, and the deadline for complete document production and production of any privilege log in total and the briefing schedule to challenge any withholdings remain set as stated in the July 2, 2010 order, located at docket #191; a nd denying as moot in part and deferring ruling in part on 225 Petitioner Chevron's Motion to Expedite Ruling, and Respondents (and the Ecuadorian Plaintiffs) to respond, addressing the narrow issue of deposing Respondents Maest and Beltman on September 13 and 14, at or before the close of business on September 3, 2010. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/31/2010.(mehcd)
|
|
Filing
214
MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 211 Plaintiffs' Motion to Adjust Briefing Scheduling and for Production of Complete Evidence used by Chevron in Docket #205. The Ecuadorian Plaintiffs and Stratus Respondents may respond to Ch evron's pending Emergency Motion for Expedited Order... [filed August 5, 2010; docket #205] on or before August 13, 2010. Petitioner Chevron may reply in support of its motion on or before August 19, 2010. Regarding the portion of this motion s eeking to compel production of the Crude outtakes,the Court finds that this request is premature and does not meet the conferral requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a). Moreover, there is no indication that the Plaintiffs have sought to subpoena Mr. Berlinger nor that the Plaintiffs filed a motion before Judge Kaplan in New York, as referred to within their motion. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/9/2010. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
161
ORDER granting 155 the Ecuadorian Plaintiffs' Motion for Clarification of the Court's May 25, 2010, Order; and denying as moot 52 Petitioner Chevron Corporation's Motion to Compel Respondents Belanger and Jones to Comply with Subpoenas, with leave to re-file. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 6/1/2010. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
154
ORDER denying 68 the Ecuadorian Plaintiffs' Motion for Protective Order in Connection with Subpoenas Issued to Certain of the Ecuadorian Plaintiffs' Non-Testifying Litigation Consultants Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782; and denying 107 Plain tiffs' [Opposed] Motion to Seal References to the Selvaviva Database Tables and Queries. Additionally, the Court informs the parties that no party may file a Status Report or other "Notice" unless granted permission by the Court or at the Court's instruction. The Court retains inherent discretion in managing its docket. Any Status Reports or other Notices filed without permission may be stricken. Any request for relief must come in the form of a motion. See D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 5/25/2010. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
139
MINUTE ORDER: Petitioner's Unopposed Motion withdrawing 126 is granted 131 . Chevron's Evidentiary Objections and Motion to Strike is withdrawn 126 . Plaintiffs' Motion to Continue 133 is granted. The Ecuadorian Plaintiffs may fi le a reply brief in support of their pending Motion for Protective Order 68 at or before noon MST, on 5/17/10. The Motion Hearing set 5/13/2010 is vacated and rescheduled for 5/19/2010 01:30 PM in Courtroom C203 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 5/12/2010.(lam, )
|
|
Filing
76
Courtroom Minutes/Minute Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Motion Hearing held on 4/27/2010, granting in part and denying in part 24 Motion for Protective Order by Stratus Respondents; and setting a briefing sch edule on the issue of privilege regarding documents produced by Ecuadorian Plaintiffs to the court-appointed expert Richard Cabrera Vega. Hearing on Ecuadorian Plaintiffs' Motion for a Protective Order... and Application to Establish Briefing Schedule for Same (Doc. #68, filed 4/26/2010) set for 5/13/2010 09:00 AM in Courtroom C203 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. (Court Reporter FTR - C. Coomes) (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER denying 39 Republic of Ecuador's Motion to Quash Subpoenas Ordering Discovery Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782; denying as moot 45 Joint Motion of Respondents and Interested Parties to Stay Discovery Pending Court's Resolution of Republ ic of Ecuador's Motion to Quash. Respondents shall file either a substantive reply in support of their 24 Motion for Protective Order or a notice that the motion is moot on or before 04/16/2010, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 04/13/2010.(wjc, )
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS: Any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and deposition s from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60 days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will be destroyed. by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 4/7/10. (mskcd)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER OF RECUSAL directing reassignment to another judge. By Judge John L. Kane on 04/05/2010. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
23
Minute Entry for Motion Hearing proceedings held before Judge John L. Kane on 3/4/2010 granting 1 Motion for Order; finding as moot 18 Motion for Leave. The parties shall meet and confer. The Opposing party shall have 30 days from the date of service of the subpoenas to file motions to quash. (Court Reporter Kara Spitler)(babia)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
