Ponder v. Zavaras et al
| Julie Lynn Ponder |
| A. Zavaras, Joe Ortiz, Noble Wallace, J. Shoemaker, Reid, Plough, Murray, Community Corrections Board and Tom Moore |
| 1:2010cv00082 |
| January 15, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Morgan |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
ORDER of Dismissal. Ordered that the second amended complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procudure by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 06/22/10 for Zita Leeson Weinshienk(jjh, )
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER denying 5 Motion for Preliminary Injunction and denying 23 Motion for Preliminary Injunction by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 05/10/10 for Zita Leeson Weinshienk(jjh, )
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Amended Complaint within 30 days by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 03/03/10. (jjh, )
|
|
Filing
9
Minute ORDER denying as premature 7 Motion for Service at State Expense by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 02/02/10.(jjh, )
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER Directing Clerk to Commence Civil Action and Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiency. Plaintiff shall have 30 days to file a certified copy of prisoner's trust fund statement, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/14/10. (jak, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
