Ochoa v. Astrue
| Norberto Marquez Ochoa |
| Michael J. Astrue |
| SSA Noticing |
| 1:2010cv00531 |
| March 8, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| John L. Kane |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
ORDER granting 29 the Parties Stipulated Motion for Attorney Fees. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall pay to Plaintiff reasonable attorney fees in the amount of $6,500.00. Payment shall be made payable to Plaintiff and delivered to Plaintiffs counsel. by Judge William J. Martinez on 11/10/2011.(ervsl, )
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER. Based upon its review of the record in this case, the Court finds that the ALJs findings are not supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, the determination that Plaintiff is not disabled is REVERSED. The Court hereby ORDERS that this matter be REMANDED to the Commissioner for an immediate award of benefits as of 3/18/2005. By Judge William J. Martinez on 9/30/2011. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER. Joint Status Report due by 2/23/2011, by Judge William J. Martinez on 2/14/11. (gmssl, )
|
|
Filing
11
Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases (ORDER) SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 7/29/2010. SS Defendants Brief due by 8/19/2010. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 9/3/2010, by Judge John L. Kane on 6/10/10. (gmssl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
