Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Co. v. King
Plaintiff: Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Co.
Defendant: Joseph King
Case Number: 1:2010cv00916
Filed: April 22, 2010
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Wiley Y. Daniel
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 88 ORDER granting stipulated motion for dismissal 87 . By Judge William J. Martinez on 4/2/2015. (tscha, )
February 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 86 ORDER Administratively Closing Case. Civil Case Terminated. By Judge William J. Martinez on 02/01/13. (alvsl)
August 2, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 80 ORDER denying 45 Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment in its entirety. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the stay on discovery pursuant to ECF No. 63 is hereby LIFTED. by Judge William J. Martinez on 8/2/2011.(erv, )
June 16, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 75 MINUTE ORDER granting 71 Motion to Vacate Final Pretrial Conference, the Final Pretrial Conference is vacated ; granting 73 Joint Motion to Schedule Telephone Status Conference; Status Conference set for 6/28/2011 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 6/16/2011.(erv, )
February 16, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER The parties are directed to confer and to file a Joint Status Report due by 2/25/2011. by Judge William J. Martinez on 2/16/2011. (erv, )
November 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER Denying as moot 38 Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion for Oral Argument Regarding its Motion to Bifurcate; denying without prejudice 16 Plaintiff Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Companys Motion to Bifurcate; denying without prejudice 22 Defen dant Kings Motion to Stay; granting in part and denying in part 23 Defendant Joseph R. Kings Motion to Bifurcate; all discovery related to Plaintiffs bad faith counterclaim is STAYED pending resolution of Defendants 45 Motion for Summary Judgment; Status Report due by 11/8/2010 by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 11/1/2010.(erv, )
October 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 48 MINUTE ORDER denying 46 Plaintiff's Renewed Motion to Stay, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/12/2010. (mehcd)
September 20, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER denying 17 Plaintiff's Motion to Stay Discovery by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 9/20/2010.(erv, )
August 4, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MINUTE ORDER denying as moot 15 Motion to Bifurcate and Stay Discovery. Entered by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 8/4/10. (wydcd, rrk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Co. v. King
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Co.
Represented By: Robert A. Zupkus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joseph King
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?