Rothe v. National City Bank
David Rothe |
National City Bank |
1:2010cv01522 |
June 28, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Arapahoe |
Robert E. Blackburn |
Michael E. Hegarty |
Other Statutory Actions |
12 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 ORDER. The Recommendation on Petition For Temporary Restraining Order 8 filed 6/30/2010, is APPROVED AND ADOPTED as an order of this court. The Recommendation To Dismiss For Failure To Prosecute 29 filed 11/16/2010, is APPROVED AND ADOPTED. The plaintiffs Petition For Temporary Restraining Order 2 filed 6/28/2010, is DENIED. Under FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b), this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE based on the plaintiffs failure to prosecute this action. All pending motions, including 3 , and 20 are DENIED as moot. JUDGMENT SHALL ENTER in favor of the defendant, National City Bank, against the plaintiff, David Rothe. The defendant is AWARDED its costs. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 1/5/2011.(sah, ) |
Filing 29 RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, to deny 3 Plaintiff's Petition for Temporary Injunction, and to deny as moot 20 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11/16/2010. (mehcd) |
Filing 18 TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE ORDER by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 9/17/10. Trial Preparation Conference set for 7/22/2011 at 04:00 PM in Courtroom A1001 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn. Four (4) day Jury Trial set for 8/8/2011 08:30 AM in Courtroom A1001 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn. (rebsec, ) |
Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER granting 10 Defendant's Motion for an Order Establishing Deadline for Defendant to Respond to Complaint to Correspond with the Time Provided Under Rule 12(a)(1). Defendant shall file an answer or other response to the Complaint b y 9/17/2010. Defendant shall also file a response to Plaintiff's Petition [Motion] for Temporary Injunction (Doc. #3) by 9/17/2010. Plaintiff may file a brief in reply to Defendant's response 14 days after the response is served. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 7/21/2010. (mehcd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Rothe v. National City Bank | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: David Rothe | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: National City Bank | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.