Street v. Simon et al
| Brian Patrick Street |
| Robert Simon, Brown, Lawson, Tixon, Waldo, Blake Davis, Mike Nalley, Harley Lappin and Lewellen |
| 1:2010cv02026 |
| August 23, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
TRIAL PREPARATION ORDER - CIVIL by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 7/30/12. (msksec, )
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 7/30/2012 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 06/04/2012. (wjcsl, )
|
|
Filing
41
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS: Defendants Brown and Lawson's Motion to Dismiss 33 is GRANTED IN PART, insofar as the claim against Defendant Lawson is dismissed for failure to state a claim, s ubject to Mr. Street filing a Motion to Amend with a proposed Third Amended Complaint that cures the defects noted above with regard to that claim within 14 days of this Order; and DENIED IN PART insofar as Mr. Street states a cognizable 8th A mendment claim against Mr. Brown. Within 14 days, Mr. Street shall SHOW CAUSE why his claims against Mr. Simon should not be dismissed for failure to effect timely service under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(m). Show Cause Response due by 4/13/2012. by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 3/30/12.(msksec, )
|
|
Filing
36
MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 34 plaintiff's Motion to Amend-Rule 15-FRCP, and denying plaintiff's Motion to Strike-Untimely Filing, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 5/3/2011.(mjwcd)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS: Any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and deposition s from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60 days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will be destroyed. by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 1/4/11. (mskcd)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER Granting Service by United States Marshal, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 12/29/10. (Attachments: # 1 Green Return Receipt for Certified Mail)(mnf, )
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER to Dismiss in Part and to Draw Case to A District Judge and to a Magistrate Judge. Defendants Mr. Tixon, Mr. Waldo, Blake Davis, Mile Nalley. Harley Lappin, and Ms. Lewellen are dismissed as parties to this action for Plaintiff's failure to allege their personal participation. The Clerk of Court is instructed to remove Defendants Mr. Tixon, Mr. Waldo, Blake Davis, Mike Nalley, Harley Lappin, and Ms. Lewellen as named parties to the suit. The remaining Defendants are Defendants Robert Simon, Brown and Larson. This case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. By Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 12/16/2010. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Amended Complaint within 30 days. Order denying as moot 3 Motion to Amend by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 11/02/10.(jjh, )
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER to Cure Deficiency within 30 days by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 09/09/10. (jjh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
