Jones v. Delta County Sheriffs Office et al
| Ted Robert Jones |
| Delta County Sheriffs Office, Daniel Abeyta, Sitton and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The |
| 1:2010cv02458 |
| October 8, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Garfield |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
ORDER denying 20 Motion to Reconsider, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 10/25/11.(lyg, )
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER of Dismissal. Ordered that the application and the amended application are denied and the action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because Applicant failed to comply with a Court Order. Ordered that no certificate of appealability will issue because Applicant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 12/07/10. (jjh, )
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER Directing Applicant to File Second Amended Application within 30 days by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/27/10. (jjh, )
|
|
Filing
1
ORDER Directing Clerk to Commence Civil Action and Directing Petitioner to Cure Deficiency. Petitioner instructed to submit a 1915 Motion and corrected Petition, within 30 days, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/7/10. (lyg, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
