Howard v. Denver County Jail et al
Dossie L. Howard, III |
Denver County Jail and County Court of Denver |
1:2010cv02623 |
October 27, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Denver |
Boyd N. Boland |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 AMENDED ORDER of Dismissal. Ordered that the action be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for the failure of Applicant to comply with the Order to cure. Ordered that no certificate of appealabil ity will issue because Mr. Howard has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 12/07/10. (jjh, ) Modified on 12/7/2010 to add the word amended to the title (jjh, ). (Main Document 5 replaced on 12/7/2010) (gms, ). Modified on 12/7/2010 to attach the correct pdf. (gms, ). |
Filing 3 ORDER of Dismissal. Ordered that the action be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for the failure of Applicant to comply with the Order to cure by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 12/03/10. (jjh, ) |
Filing 1 ORDER Directing Clerk to Commence Civil Action and Directing Applicant to Cure Deficiency. Applicant instructed to submit a 1915 Motion and corrected Application, within 30 days, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/27/10. (lyg, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.