Bynum v. People of the State of Colorado, The
Petitioner: Cecil Bynum
Respondent: People of the State of Colorado, The
Case Number: 1:2010cv02916
Filed: December 1, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Logan
Presiding Judge: Boyd N. Boland
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER On November 10, 2015, Respondents filed a Motion to Dismiss. ECF No. 80. In the Motion, Respondents advised the Court that Applicant is deceased and provided a death certificate. The Court finds that, as a result of the death of Mr. Bynum, t he instant action is moot. Therefore, the 28 U.S.C. ' 2254 Application will be denied and the action dismissed. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 80 is GRANTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Application is denied a nd the action dismissed with prejudice as moot. It is FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability will issue because Applicant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. It is FURTHER ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied, by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 11/17/2015.(evana, )
October 7, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 77 ORDER that the stay entered on June 16, 2011, is LIFTED. It isFURTHER ORDERED that within thirty days from the date of this Order Respondents and the Clerk of the Denver District Court shall file with this Clerk of the Court, in electronic format if available, a complete record of the state court proceedings in Case No. 05CR1502, including all documents in the state court file and transcripts of all proceedings conducted in the state court, along with physical evidence that is relevant to the asserted claims. by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 10/7/2015. (evana, )
June 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER denying 56 Motion Requesting Premission to File Addendum to the 2254 or a Successive 2254, Combined Motion Requesting Appointment of Counsel by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 06/14/12.(jjhsl, )
March 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER. ORDERED that Applicant's request, Doc. No. 53 , for permission to reply to Respondents' Response is DENIED by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 03/05/12. (jjhsl, )
February 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER Denying Motion to Reconsider. ORDERED that the filing titled, "Motion Requesting Clarification of Court Order" 42 is construed as a Motion to Reconsider filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) and is denied, by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 2/17/12.(lyg, )
February 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER Denying Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis on Appeal after Review re 44 Notice of Appeal by Cecil Bynum, by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 02/09/12. (bjrsl, )
January 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER denying 40 Motion for Reconsideration by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 01/03/12.(jjh, )
August 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER Denying Motion to Object to the Dismissal of Claims 26 by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 08/29/11.(jjh, )
June 16, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER. ORDERED that Respondents shall file a status report every ninety days, starting ninety days from the date of this Order, updating the court on the status of the proceedings in Denver District Court. ORDERED that until the state court record is received by this Court, this matter will be held in abeyance by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 06/16/11. (jjh, )
April 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 24 Amended 22 ORDER to Dismiss in Part and for Answer. Claim One and the discovery issue in Claim Two are procedurally barred from federal habeas review and dismissed from this action. Within thirty days Respondents are directed to file an answer in compliance with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Within thirty days from the date of this Order the Respondents shall file with the Clerk of the Court a copy of the complete record of Mr. Bynum's state court proceedings. Respondent Catherine P. Adkisson is dismissed as an unnecessary party to the action, by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 4/29/11. (lsw, )
April 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER DRAWING CASE. This case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/13/2011. (sah, )
February 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER to File Pre-Answer Response. Ordered that within 21 days Respondents shall file a Pre-Answer Response. Ordered that within 21 days of the filing of the Pre-Answer Response Applicant may file a Reply by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 01/31/11. (jjh, )
December 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER Directing Applicant to Cure Deficiency within 30 days from the date of this order, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 12/9/10. (mnf, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bynum v. People of the State of Colorado, The
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Cecil Bynum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: People of the State of Colorado, The
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?