Fellerman v. United States Army, The et al
Henry Sheldon Fellerman, Jr. |
United States Army, The and John M. McHugh |
1:2010cv02966 |
December 7, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Denver |
John L. Kane |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER. Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion for Administrative Closure of Case 12 filed 2/8/2011, is GRANTED. Under FED. R. CIV. P. 60(b), the portion of the 2/2/2011, Order 10 directing that this case be closed is WITHDRAWN. under FED. R. CIV. P. 60(b), the Judgment 11 is WITHDRAWN. This case is RE-OPENED. Under D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2, the clerk is DIRECTED to close this civil action administratively, subject to reopening for good cause. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 8/11/2011.(sah, ) |
Filing 10 ORDER. The Unopposed Motion To Remand 9 filed 2/2/2011, is GRANTED. The decision of the Army Board of Correction of Military Records that is the subject of this civil action Army Board of Correction of Military Records Docket No. AR20090012215 is REMANDED for consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military Record. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 2/2/2011.(sah, ) |
Filing 5 ORDER : Scheduling Conference set for 3/9/2011 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 12/15/10. (bnbcd, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.