Center for Biological Diversity et al v. Pizarchik et al
Center for Biological Diversity, Dine Citizens Against Ruining Our Environment and San Juan Citizens Alliance |
Joseph Pizarchik, Western Region Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement and Ken Salazar |
Navajo Nation |
BHP Navajo Coal Company |
1:2011cv00243 |
January 30, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Robert E. Blackburn |
Craig B. Shaffer |
Environmental Matters |
16 U.S.C. ยง 1531 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 75 ORDER. The Navajo Nations Amended Motion To Dismiss 47 filed 6/14/2011, is GRANTED. The Amended Complaint for Review of Federal Agency Action 11 ,filed 2/23/2011, by plaintiffs is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failureto join a required party u nder Rule 19. Judgment SHALL ENTER on behalf of defendants, Joseph Pizarchik, in his official capacity as Director, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement; Western Region Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Interior; and Ken Salazar, in his official capacity as U.S. Secretary of Interior, against plaintiffs, Center for Biological Diversity; Din Citizens Against Ruining Our Environment; and San Juan Citizens Alliance on all claims for relief and causes of action; provided, however, that the judgment SHALL BE without prejudice. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 3/14/2012.(sah, ) |
Filing 58 Minute Entry for Telephonic Status Conference held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 7/7/2011. It was ORDERED: The Navajo Nation's Amended Limited Motion to Intervene 46 is GRANTED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to any existing parties right to c hallenge the arguments and facts set forth in the The Navajo Nation's Amended Motion to Dismiss 47 . ORDERED: The Court accepts The Navajo Nation's Amended Motion to Dismiss 47 for filing. ORDERED: Any party must file their response to T he Navajo Nation's Amended Motion to Dismiss 47 on or before August 5, 2011. ORDERED: Any reply briefs in support of The Navajo Nation's Amended Motion to Dismiss 47 must be filed on or before August 26, 2011. ORDERED: All further proce edings are STAYED pending a decision of The Navajo Nation's Amended Motion to Dismiss 47 . ORDERED: Counsel for the parties to contact chambers within 72 hours of a ruling on The Navajo Nation's Amended Motion to Dismiss 47 . ORDERED: Joint Motion to Modify Scheduling Order (Doc. 29) 56 is DENIED. (FTR: L. Galera) (lag) |
Filing 45 MINUTE ORDER. The Navajo Nations Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend the Navajo Nations Limited Motion to Intervene and Motion to Dismiss 43 is GRANTED. The First Motion to Intervene 40 is moot. By Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 6/14/2011.(sah, ) |
Filing 17 ORDER. BHP Navajo Coal Companys (BNCCs) Motion to Intervene 12 is GRANTED. BHP Navajo Coal Company is permitted to intervene with full status as a party defendant. BHP Navajo Coal Companys Answer to Plaintiffs Amended Complaint for Review of Federal Agency Action [12-2] tendered to the court on 3/21/2011, is accepted for filing as of the date of this order. By Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 3/23/2011.(sah, ) |
Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion to Amend Plaintiffs Complaint as a Matter of Course Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 15 7 is GRANTED. By Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 2/23/2011.(sah, ) |
Filing 5 ORDER setting a Scheduling Conference on 4/18/2011 at 10:00 a.m., by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 2/10/11. (cbssec) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.