Robinson v. Smelser et al
||Richard Smelser and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
||March 16, 2011
||US District Court for the District of Colorado
||Boyd N. Boland
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|April 17, 2012
ORDERED that the Application For A Writ Of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28U.S.C. § 2254 1 is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE. ORDERED that a certificate of appealability shall not issue because Applicant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is DENIED by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 04/17/12. (jjhsl, )
|January 20, 2012
SECOND ORDER FOR STATE COURT RECORD. ORDERED, that within 30 days from the date of this order, the Respondents shall file with the Clerk of the Court in electronic format if available, a copy of the complete record of Applicants state court procee dings in People v. Robinson, El Paso District Court Case No. 01CR4389, including all documents in the state court file and transcripts of all proceedings conducted in the state court, but excluding any physical evidence (as opposed to documentary evidence) not relevant to the asserted claims by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 01/20/12. (jjh, )
|March 28, 2011
ORDER to File Pre-Answer Response within 21 days from the date of this Order. Applicant may file a Reply within 21 days of the filing of the Pre-Answer Response, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 3/28/11. (lsw, )
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?