Pelletier v. USA
Plaintiff: Glen Pelletier
Defendant: USA
Case Number: 1:2011cv01377
Filed: May 24, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Eagle
Presiding Judge: William J. Martinez
Presiding Judge: Craig B. Shaffer
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Labor
Jury Demanded By: None
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 28, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 158 JUDGMENT. re: 157 by Clerk on 7/28/2015. (dhans, )
July 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 157 ORDER granting 141 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 152 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying 154 Motion to Amend/Correct/Modify; denying 155 Motion for Order. The Clerk shall enter final judgment in accordance with this order and shall terminate the case; and the parties shall bear their own costs, by Judge William J. Martinez on 07/17/2015.(cthom, )
June 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 149 ORDER denying 148 Motion for Reconsideration re 147 First MOTION for Reconsideration re 145 Order on Motion for Reconsideration, filed by Carrie Lynn Pelletier, Glen Pelletier, Glen Scott Pelletier, 148 MOTION for Reconsideration filed by Carrie Lynn Pelletier, Glen Pelletier, Glen Scott Pelletier by Judge William J. Martinez on 06/24/2015.(cthom, )
June 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 133 ORDER denying 125 Motion for Reconsideration, by Judge William J. Martinez on 6/19/2014.(trlee, )
December 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 123 ORDER Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment ECF No. 117 is GRANTED; Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment ECF No. 118 is DENIED; and The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of Defendants. Defendants shall have their costs, by Judge William J. Martinez on 12/31/2013.(ervsl, )
February 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 110 ORDER Defendants Motion to Strike Amended Complaint under Federal Rule of CivilProcedure 8(a) and Partial Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint under FederalRule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) ECF No. 84 is GRANTED INPART and DENIED IN PART ; Defendants Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Amended Complaint under Rule 8(a) is DENIED; Defendants Partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint under Rule 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) is GRANTED; Plaintiffs claims for Habeas Relief and Suppression are DISMISSED WITHOUTPREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1); Plaintiffs claims for Declaratory Judgment and Equitable Estoppel are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6); and This action remains pending as to Plaintiffs APA and Constitutional Claims, by Judge William J. Martinez on 2/4/2013.(ervsl, )
October 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 109 MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: Motion Hearing held on 10/9/2012. For reasons as stated on the record, the court DENIES without prejudice 99 Motion for Discovery; DENIES without prejudice 100 Motio n to Supplement; and GRANTS 105 Motion for Protective Order. The parties shall be required to put together a conference call (303.844.2117) within 72 hours of a ruling by Judge Martinez on the defendant's 84 MOTION to Strike #75 Amended Complaint, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a), MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) in order to figure out how to get this case moving forward. FTR: Robin Mason. (cbscd, )
May 15, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 86 MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: Telephonic Status Conference held on 5/15/2012. For reasons as stated on the record, the court DENIES as unnecessary and untimely according to Rule 15(a) plaintiff's [ 81] Motion for Leave. The court instructs the plaintiff to make any further points of clarification in his response to the motion to dismiss. For reasons as stated on the record, the court DENIES without prejudice the plaintiff's 76 Motion for Discovery. The court will need to review the briefing on the motion to dismiss first before a ruling can be made. The court needs to know what claims and theories the plaintiff will be moving forward. The issue of discovery will be taken up at a more appropriate time. (FTR: Robin Mason) (cbscd, )
March 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER denying 62 Defendants Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). On the Courts own motion, all of Plaintiffs claims other than their APA and Constitutional Claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Plaintiffs filing a second amended complaint that more clearly delineates between the causes of action being asserted and specifically references the facts supporting each such cause of action, by Judge William J. Martinez on 3/28/2012.(ervsl, )
September 12, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 50 MINUTE ENTRY for Motion Hearing held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 9/12/2011. ORDERED: Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint Doc. # 40 is DENIED in light of the court&# 039;s ruling from the bench. ORDERED: Unopposed Motion for Leave to Accept Amended Complaint, Doc # 46 is DENIED. ORDERED: Plaintiff may file a final amended complaint by close of business September 14, 2011. Defendant to file an answer or otherwise respond to the final amended complaint within 30 days of the filing date of the amended complaint. (FTR: Laura Galera) (lag)
August 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 38 SECOND ORDER setting a Scheduling Conference on 10/25/2011 at 9:00 a.m., before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 8/23/11. (cbssec)
August 9, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 34 MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: Status Conference held on 8/9/2011 denying 20 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; denying 29 Motion to Amend Complaint. (FTR: Linda Kahoe) (cbscd)
June 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER setting a Scheduling Conference on 7/19/2011 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom A402, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 6/7/11. (cbssec)
May 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER denying 2 Plaintiff's Motion for TRO by Judge William J. Martinez on 5/25/2011.(erv, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pelletier v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Glen Pelletier
Represented By: Christopher Jonathan Pooley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Represented By: Glenn Matthew Girdharry
Represented By: Kevin Thomas Traskos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?