Dahmer v. Jones et al
Petitioner: John J. Dahmer
Respondent: Susan Jones and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Case Number: 1:2011cv01400
Filed: May 26, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Fremont
Presiding Judge: Lewis T Babcock
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 13, 2011 Filing 11 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #10 ORDER of Dismissal, on 10/13/11. (lyg, )
October 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER of Dismissal. ORDERED that the application is denied and the action is dismissed because it is barred by the one-year limitation period in 28 U.S.C. 2244(d). FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability will issue, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 10/13/11. (lyg, )
September 27, 2011 Filing 9 RESPONSE to #8 Order for Supplemental Pre-Answer Response by Respondents Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The, Susan Jones. (Van Horn, Patricia)
September 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Amended #7 ORDER to Supplement Pre-Answer Response, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 9/13/11. (lsw, )
September 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER to Supplement Pre-Answer Response, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 9/12/11. (lsw, )
July 15, 2011 Filing 6 Pre-Answer REPLY re #2 ORDER to File Pre-Answer Response, by Petitioner John J. Dahmer. (lyg, )
June 23, 2011 Filing 5 RESPONSE to #2 Order Pre-Answer Response by Respondents Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The, Susan Jones. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F)(Van Horn, Patricia)
June 13, 2011 Filing 4 Acceptance of Service upon Susan Jones on 6/13/11. (lygsl, )
June 10, 2011 Filing 3 Acknowledgment on behalf of Office of the Attorney General of the State of Colorado, John W. Suthers, on 6/10/11. (lyg, )
June 10, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER to File Pre-Answer Response within 21 days from the date of this Order, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 6/10/11. (lsw, )
May 26, 2011 Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus 28 U.S.C. 2254 (Filing fee $ 5, Receipt Number 38191), filed by John J. Dahmer. (Attachments: #1 Receipt)(lyg, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dahmer v. Jones et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: John J. Dahmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Susan Jones
Represented By: Patricia R. Van Horn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Represented By: Patricia R. Van Horn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?