Oates v. Patella
| Sherwyn Oates |
| Matthew Patella |
| 1:2011cv01871 |
| July 19, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Crowley |
| Robert E. Blackburn |
| Kristen L. Mix |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
ORDER. The objections stated in plaintiffs Objection to Magistrates Recommendation 31 filed 2/24/2012, are OVERRULED. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 3/6/2012. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER. The Order and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 28 filed 2/1/2012, is APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Defendant Matthew Patellas Motion To Dismiss All Remaining Claims Pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.Pro. [sic] 12(b)(6) 21 filed 10/17/2011, is GRANTED. Plaintiffs claims against defendant are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Judgment SHALL ENTER on behalf of defendant, Matthew Patella, against plaintiff, Sherwyn Oates, on all claims for relief and causes of action asserted against him; provided, that the judgment shall be without prejudice. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 2/22/2012.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
19
MINUTE ORDER in re: Defendant Matthew Patellas Status Report 18 filed 10/3/2011. Defendant Patella shall answer or otherwise respondto Plaintiffs excessive force claim against Defendant Patella, as set forth in the 9/19/2011 Order, on or before 10/1 7/2011. Defendant Patellas Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) 11 is DENIED AS MOOT. A Preliminary Scheduling Conference is set for 11/15/2011 at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom C-204before Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 10/3/2011.(sah2, )
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER REQUIRING SERVICE BY UNITED STATES MARSHAL. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 9/26/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Process Receipt and Return)(sah, )
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER to Dismiss in Part and to Draw Case to A District Judge and to a Magistrate Judge. All claims other than the excessive force claim against Matthew Patella are dismissed without prejudice for the reasons discussed in this order. Defendants Brandon Booth and Kenneth R. Buck are dismissed as parties to this action because all claims against them have been dismissed. This case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 9/19/2011. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiencies within 30 days, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 7/28/11. (lsw, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Oates v. Patella | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sherwyn Oates | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Matthew Patella | |
| Represented By: | Stacey L. Aurzada |
| Represented By: | Robert Howard Choate |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
