Hover v. C.C.A et al
| David Hover |
| Meis, Alcorn, Brubaker, C.C.A., Tupper, Chavez and Correctional Health Partners |
| 1:2011cv02170 |
| August 19, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Logan |
| William J. Martinez |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
ORDER The Magistrate Judges Recommendation ECF No. 57 is ADOPTED in its entirety; Plaintiffs Motion to voluntarily dismiss this action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) ECF No. 44 , is GRANTED; This action is hereby DISMISSED WITHOU T PREJUDICE; The parties shall bear their own costs; Plaintiffs Motion for Appointment of Counsel ECF No. 32 , is DENIED AS MOOT; Plaintiffs Motion for Injunction (Mandatory) for Accommodation ECF No. 33 , is DENIED AS MOOT; Plaintiffs Motion f or Dismissal of Felony Charges ECF No. 34 is DENIED AS MOOT; Plaintiffs Motion for Mandatory Injunction ECF No. 35 , is DENIED AS MOOT; Plaintiffs Motion for Relief from a Judgment or Order ECF No. 36 , is DENIED AS MOOT; Plaintiffs Motion for Joinder of Defendants ECF No. 37 , is DENIED AS MOOT; Defendant Correctional Health Partners Motion to Dismiss ECF No. 39 is DENIED AS MOOT; and Defendants Tupper, Meis, Alcorn, and Brubakers Motion to Dismiss ECF No. 48 is DENIED AS MOOT, by Judge William J. Martinez on 4/10/2012.(ervsl, )
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER to Dismiss in Part and to Draw Case to District Judge and Magistrate Judge. Claims one and three are dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) as legally frivolous. The following Defendants are dismissed as parties to this lawsuit: John Hickenlooper, Tony Carochi, Amick & Jenks Inc., Compass Group, Compass One L.L.C., Canteen Services, and Unknown Companys [sic]/Corporation contracting/subcontracting for C.D.O.C. and/or C.C.A. as medical providers during the time period 2007 th rough 2011 at Fremont facility, Fort Lyons facility, Bent County correctional facility and Sterling correctional facility. The clerk of the Court remove the names of JohnHickenlooper, Tony Carochi, Amick & Jenks Inc., Compass Group, Compass OneL.L.C ., Canteen Services, and Unknown Companys [sic]/Corporation contracting/subcontracting for C.D.O.C. and/or C.C.A. as medical providers during the time period 2007 through 2011 at Fremont facility, Fort Lyons facility, Bent County correctional facilit y and Sterling correctional facility as parties to this lawsuit. It is FURTHER ORDERED that remaining claim two and the case are drawn to a district judge and magistrate judge. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the only remaining defendants are: C.C.A. - dba Bent County Correctional Facility, Correctional Health Partners (W.C.S.), and Correctional Officers Meis, Chavez, Brubaker, Tupper, Alcorn, and Unknown John Doe. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 12/1/2011. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
21
Minute ORDER denying as moot 20 Motion to Set Aside Judgment of Dismissal, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 11/16/11.(lygsl, )
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER Vacating Dismissal re 15 Order, 16 Clerk's Judgment because Plaintiff, David Hover, filed an amended complaint on 11/2/11, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 11/7/11. (lygsl, )
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER Of Dismissal. The complaint and the action are dismissed without prejudice, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 11/3/11. (lsw, )
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER Denying 3 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 9/26/11.(lsw, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
