Peterson v. Timme et al
| Bruce Edward Peterson |
| Rae Timme and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The |
| 1:2011cv03003 |
| November 17, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Fremont |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
MINUTE ORDER re: 51 Amended Habeas Corpus Petition § 2254. by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 12/3/14. (jdyne, )
|
|
Filing
36
FINAL JUDGMENT by Clerk re: 35 Order. By Edward P. Butler, Deputy Clerk on 10/11/12. (alvsl)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER Denying 1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Bruce Edward Peterson. IT IS ORDERED that the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 1 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability shall not issue because Applicant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). It is FURTHER ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order is not taken in good faith, and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U. S. 438 (1962). If Applicant files a notice of appeal he must also pay the full $455 appellate filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit within thirty days in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 24. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Rule 56 A, 32 is denied as moot. Civil Case Terminated. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 10/10/12. (alvsl)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER Denying 29 Motion for Summary Judgment as Improperly filed; Denying Applicant's 30 Denying as moot request for status of the Motion for Dismissal by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 7/26/2012.(ervsl, )
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER TO DISMISS IN PART AND FOR ANSWER IN PART AND STATE COURT RECORD. Claims One and Two are dismissed with prejudice as procedurally barred from federal habeas review. Within thirty days Respondents are directed to file an Answer in compliance w ith Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases that fully addresses the merits of the ineffective trial counsel claims as stated above. Within thirty days of the filing of the Answer Mr. Peterson may file a Reply, if he desires. Within thirty days from the date of this Order the Respondents shall file with the Clerk of the Court, in electronic format if available, a copy of the complete record of Mr. Petersons state court proceedings in Case No. 07CR7062, including all documents in the state court file and transcripts of all proceedings conducted in the state court, but excluding any physical evidence (as opposed to documentary evidence) not relevant to the asserted claims. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 4/5/2012. (sahsl, )
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER Drawing Case. Case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/2/12. (gmssl, )
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER to File Pre-Answer Response, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/4/12. (lsw, )
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER Directing Applicant to Cure Deficiency, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 11/18/11. (lyg, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
