In re: Poddar
| U.S. Trustee |
| Farm Credit of Southern Colorado, FLCA, Paul Gefreh, PNC Bank, National Association and United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado |
| Rohit Poddar |
| Rohit Poddar |
| 1:2011cv03009 |
| November 17, 2011 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX Outside US |
| John L. Kane |
| Appeal |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
ORDER denying 40 Motion for Immediate Stay, by Judge John L. Kane on 4/4/12.(gmssl, )
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER denying as unitelligible 34 Plaintiff's filing, by Judge John L. Kane on 3/20/2012.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER to Cure Deficiency re 29 Notice of Appeal by Rohit Poddar, by Judge John L. Kane on 02/27/12. (bjrsl, )
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER denying 27 Motion for Reconsideration, by Judge John L. Kane on 2/9/12.(gmssl, )
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER Transmitting Filing to District Court. Clerk to transmit the Objection filed by the appellant and a copy of this order to the District Court. The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel shall take no further action with respect to the objection, by U.S. Bankruptcy Appellate Panel on 1/30/12. (gmssl, )
|
|
Filing
23
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 8 UST's Motion to Dismiss. All parties shall bear their own fees and costs, by Judge John L. Kane on 1/24/12.(gmssl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
