Jackson v. Hannen et al
Plaintiff: David Jackson
Defendant: J. Mark Hannen, John W. Suthers and Tammy L. Herivel
Case Number: 1:2011cv03312
Filed: December 16, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Arapahoe
Presiding Judge: Boyd N. Boland
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 8, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER denying 28 Motion/Affidavit to Reconsider Vacating February 21, 2012 and February 27, 2012 Orders, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 3/8/12.(lygsl, )
March 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 27 Minute ORDER. Plaintiff's Motion/Affidavit for Independent Action to Vacate February 21, 2012 and February 27, 2012 Orders 25 is DENIED. Motion/Affidavit for Stay of Execution of Judgment Pending Appeal 26 is DENIED as moot. Plaintiff's Amended Motion With Attachment for Leave of the Court toRemand for a Rule 60(b) Motion 24 is DENIED without prejudice, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 3/6/12.(lygsl, )
February 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER Imposing Filing Restrictions. ORDERED that Mr. Jackson is prohibited from filing any new action in the U.S.D.C. for the District of Colorado without the representation of a licensed attorney admitted to practice in the District of Colorado unless he obtains permission to proceed pro se as described in this order. FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the Court shall add Mr. Jackson to the list of sanctioned litigants, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 2/27/12. (lyg, )
February 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER Denying Motions. ORDERED that Plaintiff's "Motion for New Trial..." 10 is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's "Motion to Expedite..." 12 is DENIED as moot, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 2/21/12.(lygsl, )
January 24, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER of Dismissal and to Show Cause. The complaint, the amended complaint, the second amended complaint, and the action are dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied. Plaintiff show cause why the filing restrictions specified in this order should not be imposed, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 1/24/12. (lsw, )
January 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER granting 6 Motion for Leave to file a second amended complaint 6 , by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/18/12.(lsw, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jackson v. Hannen et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Mark Hannen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John W. Suthers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tammy L. Herivel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?