Spokas v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company et al
Plaintiff: |
Samantha Spokas |
Defendant: |
American Family Mutual Insurance Company and Kevin Cahill |
Case Number: |
1:2012cv00380 |
Filed: |
February 13, 2012 |
Court: |
U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
Office: |
Denver Office |
County: |
Arapahoe |
Presiding Judge: |
Wiley Y. Daniel |
Presiding Judge: |
Kristen L. Mix |
Nature of Suit: |
Insurance |
Cause of Action: |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Jury Demanded By: |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
November 2, 2015 |
Filing
139
ORDER that Plaintiffs Motion for Judicial Review of Clerks Taxation of CostsECF No. 122 is GRANTED to the extent that pursuant to Colo. Rev. Stat. § 10-3-1116, costs (in addition to those previously taxed by the Clerk) are taxed in the amoun t of $26,242.24 against the Defendant. This amount is calculated as follows: Requested amount: $40,896.23, Reduced by: $2,500.00 (disallowed portion of Dr. Prusmacks fees); $3,613.59 (disallowed costs for attorney hotel expense s); $6,992.40 (disallowed costs for a focus group); $1,548.00 (disallowed portion of mediation costs); $14,653.99 Total costs awarded: $26,242.24. The motion is DENIED in all other respects. by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 11/2/2015.(evana, )
|
June 26, 2015 |
Filing
114
ORDER re: 102 . Entered by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 06/26/15. (jhawk, )
|
June 25, 2015 |
Filing
113
MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Judge Wiley Y. Daniel: Motion Hearing held on 6/25/2015. 102 Motion for Judgment granted in part and denied in part. Court Reporter: Mary George. (rkeec)
|
May 5, 2015 |
Filing
101
MINUTE ORDER Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Amended Motion for Judgment ECF No. 100 is GRANTED. The Motion for Judgment ECF No. 98 is DENIED AS MOOT. The Amended Motion for Judgment, filed at ECF No. 100 , is accepted for filing, by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 5/5/2015.(evana, )
|
April 16, 2015 |
Filing
87
ORDER Before I enter Judgment in this case, I require the parties input on the application of certain state law statutory provisions. Accordingly, the parties shall meet and confer as to the appropriate amount of damages awardable under the forego ing law and file such amount with the Court. However, should the parties fail to reach agreement as to such an amount, the parties shall submit simultaneous briefing as to the proper award of damages (including pre and post-judgment interest) in this case. The parties shall also submit any and all requests for reasonable attorneys fees. All such briefing shall be filed not later than Thursday, April 30, 2015, by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 4/16/2015. (evana, )
|
March 19, 2015 |
Filing
71
MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Judge Wiley Y. Daniel: Trial Preparation Conference held on 3/19/2015. Granting 70 Motion to Strike. Denying Defendants oral motion to reconsider Courts ruling on Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendant's Sixth Supplemental Expert Disclosure Documents and Dr. Rauzzino's Supplemental Expert Report. Court Reporter: Mary George. (rkeec)
|
March 18, 2013 |
Filing
27
MINUTE ORDER; 25 Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order is GRANTED. The Scheduling Order 16 is amended to extend the following deadlines: Discovery due by 4/30/2013. Dispositive Motions due by 5/14/2013, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 3/18/2013.(klmcd, )
|
January 3, 2013 |
Filing
23
MINUTE ORDER granting 21 Motion to Amend Scheduling Order by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 01/03/13.(jjhsl, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?