Riley v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.
| Frances Riley |
| JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Law Offices of Robert J. Hopp & Associates, LLC, Robert J. Hopp, Robert (I) Hopp, Sally Zeman and Sally (I) Zeman |
| 1:2012cv00821 |
| March 30, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Douglas |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| William J. Martinez |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
ORDER granting 48 Motion for Summary Judgment; affirming, adopting, and modifying the 63 Report and Recommendations as noted; overruling 77 Plaintiff's Objection; and dismissing all of Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Chase Bank, N.A. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment as set forth in the Order. Entered by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 8/3/2015. (cpear)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER granting 71 Motion to update name on the record, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 12/2/2014.(tscha, )
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 5/6/14. IT IS ORDERED: The proposed final pretrial order is REFUSED. A supplemental final pretrial conference will be set after the district judge rules on the pending recommendation and objection. The defendant shall file a status report within ten days of the order of the district judge resolving the recommendation. (bsimm)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 3/4/14. Plaintiff's Motion and Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Withdrawal of Admissions 54 is DENIED. (Simmons, B.)
|
|
Filing
56
MINUTE ORDER granting 54 Plaintiffs Motion and Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Withdrawal of Admissions. IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED and defendant shall respond to the Motion on or before November 22, 2013. No reply will be accepted without leave of court. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 11/15/2013.(ervsl, )
|
|
Filing
47
MINUTE ORDER granting in part 45 Motion to Continue Plaintiff's Emergency Request for Continuance and Stay on All Discovery, or in the Alternative, Motion for Extension of at Least Five Days to Respond to Defendant's Discovery Requests Due to Family Health Related Emergency Stay. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 8/26/13.(bnbcd, )
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER The Magistrate Judges Recommendation ECF No. 23 is ADOPTED in its entirety; Defendant Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.s Motion to Dismiss ECF No. 9 is GRANTED; Plaintiffs claims against Defendant Mortgage Electronic Registra tion Systems, Inc. are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; and Defendants request for an award of costs and attorney fees contained within the Motion to Dismiss is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as premature, by Judge William J. Martinez on 1/15/2013.(ervsl, )
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER The Magistrate Judges Recommendation ECF No. 21 , is ADOPTED in its entirety; Plaintiffs Verified Complaint ECF No. 1 , is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to Defendants Law Offices of Robert J. Hopp & Associates, LLC, Robert J. Hopp, and Sally Zeman for failure to prosecute, insufficiency of service of process, failure to timely effect service of process, and failure to comply with an Order of the Court. By Judge William J. Martinez on 10/25/2012.(ervsl, )
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER: Plaintiff shall file proof of proper service on or before 9/24/12. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 9/4/12. (bnbcd, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
