<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/xsl/rss2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Glaser v. City and County of Denver Colorado, The et al :: Justia Dockets &amp; Filings</title>
        <link>https://dockets.justia.com/docket/colorado/codce/1:2012cv00828/132363</link>
        <atom:link href="https://dockets.justia.com/docket/colorado/codce/1:2012cv00828/132363/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2026 03:03:15 -0800</pubDate>
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2026 03:03:15 -0800</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Justia Dockets &amp; Filings</generator>
        <copyright>Copyright 2026 Justia Inc</copyright>
        <description>Glaser v. City and County of Denver Colorado, The et al - Case Documents</description>
             
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 86]]>
                    </title>
                    <link>
                https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/colorado/codce/1:2012cv00828/132363/86
            </link>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                ORDER. Motion # 19 is GRANTED to the extent that all claims against the Denver Defendants are dismissed. Claims 1-5, 10, 12-13, 16, and 17 are dismissed with prejudice. Claims 6-9, 11, 14 and 15 are dismissed without prejudice, except that to th e extent those claims were asserted against individuals in their official capacities, they are dismissed with prejudice. Motion # 36 is GRANTED to the extent that all claims against the Denver DA Defendants are dismissed. With the exception of cla im 15, all claims against the Denver DA Defendants in both their individual and official capacities are dismissed with prejudice. Claim 15 is dismissed with prejudice as to these defendants&#039; official capacities but without prejudice in their individual capacities. Motion # 43 is GRANTED to the extent that all claims against defendants Anne Mansfield and Rhea Babcock are dismissed. All claims against Judge Mansfield are dismissed with prejudice. Claims 1-5, 10, 16 and 18 asserted aga inst Ms. Babcock are dismissed with prejudice. Claims 6-9 and 11 asserted against Ms. Babcock are dismissed with prejudice in her official capacity and without prejudice in her individual capacity. Motion # 47 is GRANTED to the extent that the cla im against Rick Flores (included in claim 6) is dismissed. It is dismissed with prejudice in his official capacity and without prejudice in his individual capacity. Motion # 51 is GRANTED to the extent that all claims against Joe Joyce are dismis sed. Claims 1-5 and 16 against defendant Joe Joyce are dismissed with prejudice in both his individual and official capacities. Claims 6-8 and 15 are dismissed with prejudice in his official capacity but without prejudice in his individual capaci ty. Claim 19 is dismissed with prejudice as against all served defendants in all capacities. To any extent not otherwise specified, all claims asserted against individual defendants in their "official capacity" are dismissed with preju dice. The claims against defendants Matt McQueen, Ray Willis Mannon and Douglas Pritchard, who were never served with the summons and complaint, are dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Recommendation # 74 is ACCEPTED in part, su bject to the comments in this order. Objections ## 76 , 77 , 78 , and 79 are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Objection # 80 is DENIED. In summary, the Court directs that final judgment be entered dismissing this case and all claims there in, either with or without prejudice as specified in this Order. As the prevailing parties defendants are awarded their reasonable costs pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d) (1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1. The Court finds that because many of the claims asserted have been asserted in previous lawsuits filed by Mr. Glaser, and to some extend dismissed with prejudice by other judges in this court, the filing and maintenance of this case have in large part been substantially groundless, frivolous and vexatious. In recognition of Mr. Glaser&#039;s pro se and incarcerated status, the Court declines to award attorney&#039;s fees. If he files the same claims against the same defendants in a new lawsuit in the future, he should not expect that result again. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 04/05/13. (alvsl)
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid>
                https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/colorado/codce/1:2012cv00828/132363/86
            </guid>
                <pubDate>
            Fri, 05 Apr 2013 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 75]]>
                    </title>
                    <link>
                https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/colorado/codce/1:2012cv00828/132363/75
            </link>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                MINUTE ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Request for Court Ordered Legal Access Docket No. 60 ; Filed October 15, 2012, Motion to Appoint Counsel # 66 ; Filed December 26, 2012 and Motion for Assistance with Service # 67 ; Fi led December 26, 2012 (collectively, the Motions). Defendants have not filed a response to any of the Motions. The Court recently issued a Recommendation 74 that this action be dismissed. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that in light of the Courts Recommendation 74 that this action be dismissed, Plaintiffs Motions ## 60 , 66 and 67 are DENIED AS MOOT, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 3/1/2013.(ervsl, )
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid>
                https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/colorado/codce/1:2012cv00828/132363/75
            </guid>
                <pubDate>
            Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:00:00 -0800
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 41]]>
                    </title>
                    <link>
                https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/colorado/codce/1:2012cv00828/132363/41
            </link>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                Minute ORDER denying as moot 38 Emergency Motion to Stay Return Date for Subpoena Duces Tecum, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 8/16/12.(lygsl, )
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid>
                https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/colorado/codce/1:2012cv00828/132363/41
            </guid>
                <pubDate>
            Thu, 16 Aug 2012 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 40]]>
                    </title>
                    <link>
                https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/colorado/codce/1:2012cv00828/132363/40
            </link>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                MINUTE ORDER granting 33 non-party Clerk of the Denver District Courts (theClerk) Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum Issued to Clerk of the Denver District Court. The subpoena served on the Clerk on August 1, 2012 is QUASHED, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 8/15/2012.(ervsl, )
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid>
                https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/colorado/codce/1:2012cv00828/132363/40
            </guid>
                <pubDate>
            Wed, 15 Aug 2012 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 35]]>
                    </title>
                    <link>
                https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/colorado/codce/1:2012cv00828/132363/35
            </link>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                MINUTE ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Assist 28 is GRANTED. Plaintiff need not mail hard copies of his Response 27 and attached exhibits to Defendants, who were electronically served on July 27, 2012; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Extend 30 is GRANTED; Defendant Joyce shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint in both his official and individual capacities on or before August 31, 2012, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 8/13/2012.(ervsl, )
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid>
                https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/colorado/codce/1:2012cv00828/132363/35
            </guid>
                <pubDate>
            Mon, 13 Aug 2012 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 13]]>
                    </title>
                    <link>
                https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/colorado/codce/1:2012cv00828/132363/13
            </link>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                ORDER of Reference to United States Magistrate Judge by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 6/11/12. (dkals, )
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid>
                https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/colorado/codce/1:2012cv00828/132363/13
            </guid>
                <pubDate>
            Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 3]]>
                    </title>
                    <link>
                https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/colorado/codce/1:2012cv00828/132363/3
            </link>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                ORDER Directing Plantiff to Cure Deficiency by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/03/2012. (skssl, )
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid>
                https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/colorado/codce/1:2012cv00828/132363/3
            </guid>
                <pubDate>
            Tue, 03 Apr 2012 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                </channel>
</rss>
