Stephens v. Astrue
| Tammy S. Stephens |
| Michael J. Astrue |
| SSA Noticing |
| 1:2012cv01162 |
| May 3, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Weld |
| John L. Kane |
| Supplemental Security Income |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER granting 30 Unopposed Application For Award of Attorney FeesUnder EAJA. The Estate of Tammy Stephens is awarded attorney fees in the amount of $5266 payable to the Estate of Tammy Stephens in care of the office of counsel for plaintiff. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 7/8/2013. (klyon, )
|
|
Filing
29
MINUTE ORDER granting 28 Defendant's Unopposed Motion For Withdrawal of Counsel. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 5/3/2013.(klyon, )
|
|
Filing
27
JUDGMENT by Clerk in favor of Estate of Tammy Stephens against Michael J. Astrue re: 26 Order, by Clerk on 4/25/2013. (klyon, )
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER re: 1 Complaint. The conclusion of the Commissioner through the Administrative Law Judge that plaintiff was not disabled is REVERSED. This case is REMANDED to the ALJ. Plaintiff is AWARDED her costs to be taxed by the clerk of the court. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 4/22/2013. (klyon, )
|
|
Filing
11
Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases. SS Plaintiff's Brief due by 8/28/2012. SS Defendant's Brief due by 9/28/2012. SS Plaintiff's Reply Brief due by 10/15/2012, by Judge John L. Kane on 7/23/12. (lygsl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
