Shandon Valley Transport Solutions USA, LLC v. Design Pallets, Inc. et al
| Shandon Valley Transport Solutions USA, LLC |
| Design Pallets, Inc., Douglas A. Olvey and James Danko |
| Design Pallets, Inc. |
| Shandon Valley Transport Solutions USA, LLC |
| Design Pallets, Inc. |
| Shandon Valley Transport Solutions USA, LLC, Colin D. Clark, Adam M. Pener, Steven C. Davis and David W. Fell |
| 1:2012cv01900 |
| July 23, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Douglas |
| Christine M. Arguello |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
109
ORDER of Dismissal with Prejudice by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 7/26/13. (dkals, )
|
|
Filing
103
ORDER to Stay Proceedings re: 102 Joint Motion for Stay and Notice of Settlement by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 5/20/13. This case is stayed for 30 days, and the motions hearing and final pretrial conference are vacated.(dkals, )
|
|
Filing
94
MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to 93 Notice of Withdrawal of Motions for Protective Order, 86 Motion for Protective Order is DENIED AS WITHDRAWN and 89 Motion for Protective Order is DENIED AS WITHDRAWN. The hearing on these motions set for 5/1/13 is VACATED. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/23/13.(bnbcd, )
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER to Amend Pleadings: Plaintiff Shandon Valley Transport Solutions USA, LLC shall file a Second Amended Complaint, and Defendant Design Pallets, Inc. shall file an Amended Answer, a Second Amended Counterclaims, and an Amended Third-Party Complaint. 38 Motion to Dismiss, 45 Motion Partially to Dismiss, and Motion to Dismiss #9 in 12-cv-02094 are denied as moot. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 3/20/13.(dkals, )
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER Re: Stipulation to Dismiss Claims Against Third-Party Defendant With Prejudice 79 . All claims against Third-Party Defendants Stevan C. Davis and David W. Fell are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is FURTHER ORDERED that each party shall pays his or its own costs, attorney fees and expenses. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the caption on all subsequent filings shall reflect the removal of Steven C. Davis and David W. Fell as Third-Party Defendants in this case. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 3/11/2013. (cmacd)
|
|
Filing
76
PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 11/28/12. (mnfsl, ) Modified on 11/28/2012 to correct title(mnfsl, ).
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER REGARDING MOTIONS: 31 Motion for Determination of Jurisdiction, 44 Motion to Amend Complaint, 4 Motion for Joinder, and 43 Motion to Consolidate are granted. First Amended Complaint 44 , begining page 5, is accepted as filed. 29 Motion to Transfer Venue is denied as moot. 12-cv-02094-REB is consolidated with this case for all purposes. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 10/24/12.(dkals, ) Modified on 10/24/2012 (dkals, ).
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER Regarding E-Discovery. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 9/26/12. (bnbcd, )
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 9/26/2012 10:30 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland, proposed Scheduling Order due on or before 9/19/12. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 8/8/12. (bnbcd, )
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER Granting Motion for Additional Extension of Time to File Return of Service, no Extensions. by Herbert L. Stern, III, District Court Judge on 03/22/2012. (dbera, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
