Tian v. Newmont International Services Limited
Fang Tian |
Newmont International Services Limited |
1:2012cv02515 |
September 21, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
XX US, Outside State |
John L. Kane |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 134 ORDER of Dismissal With Prejudice. Each party to bear her or its own attorney fees and costs. Signed by Judge John L. Kane on 04/26/16. (jhawk, ) |
Filing 132 JUDGMENT in favor of Fang Tian and against Newmont International Services Limited by Clerk on 2/25/2016. (babia) |
Filing 128 ORDER denying 113 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; granting in part and denying in part 114 Motion to Amend Judgment, by Judge John L. Kane on 02/18/2016.(cthom, ) |
Filing 103 ORDER on Promissory Estoppel Claim. In light of the jury's award of legal relief, and because any damages on Plaintiffs promissory estoppel claim would be duplicative of those already awarded by the jury on Plaintiff's negligenceclaims, Plaintiff's promissory estoppel claim is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, by Judge John L. Kane on 09/08/2015. (cthom, ) |
Filing 101 STIPULATION AND ORDER GOVERNING THE CUSTODY AND DISPOSITION OF TRIAL EXHIBITS, DEPOSITIONS, TRANSCRIPTS, AND PAPERS by Judge John L. Kane on 9/2/15. (babia) |
Filing 97 Final Jury Instructions. Entered by Judge John L. Kane on 08/31/15. (jhawk, ) |
Filing 95 ORDER on Jury Instructions. Plaintiff's objection is OVERRULED and Instruction No. 24 will apply to both of Plaintiff's negligence claims Entered by Judge John L. Kane on 08/24/15. (jhawk, ) |
Filing 92 Jury Instructions. Entered by Judge John L. Kane on 08/12/15. (jhawk, ) |
Filing 74 ORDER denying 59 Motion in Limine; denying 66 Motion for Leave, by Judge John L. Kane on 06/24/2015. (athom, ) |
Filing 65 ORDER granting 64 Motion to Put Under Seal Exhibit C to the Reply in Support of the Motion in Limine. Entered by Judge John L. Kane on 06/05/15.(jhawk, ) |
Filing 42 ORDER Setting Pretrial Conference for 12/3/2014 10:00 AM before Judge John L. Kane by Judge John L. Kane on 11/04/14. (jhawk, ) |
Filing 40 ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 25 and Denying Defendant's Motion to Strike 37 by Judge John L. Kane on 09/18/14.(jhawk, ) |
Filing 16 Stipulation and PROTECTIVE ORDER, by Judge John L. Kane on 4/16/13. (sgrim) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Tian v. Newmont International Services Limited | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Fang Tian | |
Represented By: | Sara Ann Green |
Represented By: | Elwyn F. Schaefer |
Represented By: | Tatiana Taylor |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Newmont International Services Limited | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.