Estate of Jimma Pal Reat et al v. Rodriguez et al
| Estate of Jimma Pal Reat, James Pal Reat, Rebecca Awok Diag, Ran Pal, Changkuoth Pal and Joseph Kolong |
| Juan Jesus Rodriguez and City and County of Denver |
| 1:2012cv02531 |
| September 24, 2012 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Denver |
| Robert E. Blackburn |
| Michael E. Hegarty |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
211
ORDER OF ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSURE: This case is administratively close pending further developments in the appeal. Any pending motion, including but not limited to Defendant's 198 Motion to Exclude is denied without prejudice. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 4/1/2015. (alowe)
|
|
Filing
210
ORDER granting 205 Unopposed Motion to Stay Proceedings under the Scheduling Order. Proceedings are STAYED pending appellate resolution of the pending interlocutory appeal. The combined Trial Preparation Conference and Final Pretrial Conference set 2/6/2015 and the trial by jury set to commence 2/23/2015 are VACATED and CONTINED pending further order. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 2/3/2015. (alowe)
|
|
Filing
203
MINUTE ORDER denying 202 Motion for Extension or stay of proceedings under the scheduling order, by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 12/31/2014.(tscha, )
|
|
Filing
201
ORDER denying 188 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 12/16/2014.(alowe)
|
|
Filing
191
ORDER granting 151 Stipulated Motion to Reset Deadline for Rule 702 Motions. Rule 702 Motions due by 12/1/2014. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 10/7/2014.(alowe)
|
|
Filing
183
ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS TO AND ADOPTING 159 RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The 147 Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' claims against the defendant, the City and County of Denver are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 9/3/2014. (alowe )
|
|
Filing
182
MINUTE ORDER granting 180 Motion to Amend scheduling order. Dispositive motions due: September 26, 2014. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/6/2014.(trlee, )
|
|
Filing
179
MINUTE ORDER granting 177 Motion to modify scheduling order to extend deadline to complete depositions. Discovery cut off: 8/6/2014. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 7/15/2014.(trlee, )
|
|
Filing
166
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Motion Hearing held on 5/29/2014, withdrawing 160 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel and extending the expert witness discovery deadline to 6/2/2014. FTR: C. Pearson -- Courtroom A-501. (cpear)
|
|
Filing
158
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Motion Hearing held on 4/28/2014, taking under advisement 147 Defendant City and County of Denver's Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint. FTR: C. Pearson -- Courtroom A-501. (cpear)
|
|
Filing
156
SECOND TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE ORDER: Final Pretrial Conference and Trial Preparation Conference are set 2/6/2015 09:30 AM in Courtroom A1001 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn. Eleven (10) day Jury Trial set 2/23/2015 08:30 AM in Courtroom A1001 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 4/16/14. (rebsec)
|
|
Filing
155
ORDER adopting 153 Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.The combined Final Pretrial Conference and Trial Preparation Conference set Friday, June 13, 2014, at 3:30 p.m., and the trial, set to commence onJune 30, 2014, are VACATED an d CONTINUED pending further order. The combined Final Pretrial Conference and Trial Preparation Conference and trial, SHALL BE RESET during a telephonic setting conference on Wednesday, April 16, 2014, at 10:00 a.m. (MDT). By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 3/31/2014.(klyon, )
|
|
Filing
153
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 149 the Stipulated Motion to Amend Scheduling Order and Vacate and Reset Combined Trial Preparation Conference/Final Pretrial Conference and Jury Trial. Initial expert designation due by 5/30/2014. Rebut tal expert designation due by 6/27/2014. Discovery due by 7/18/2014. Dispositive Motions due by 8/15/2014. This Court recommends that the Trial Preparation Conference/Final Pretrial Conference and eight-day jury trial be vacated and reset as Judge Blackburn's calendar permits. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 3/7/2014. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
142
ORDER on Motion to Amend 137 . ORDERED that the Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint with Certificate of Conferral and Request for Oral Argument 137 is GRANTED by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 01/17/14.(jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
129
MINUTE ORDER granting 127 Unopposed Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order with Respect to the Deadline for Joinder of Parties and Amendment of Pleadings. Deadline for Joinder of Parties and Amendment of Pleadings: 12/15/2013. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/29/2013.(klyon, )
|
|
Filing
119
TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE ORDER: Proposed Pretrial Order due by 6/6/2014. Final Pretrial Conference and Trial Preparation Conference are set for 6/13/2014 03:30 PM in Courtroom A1001 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn. Eight (8) day Jury Trial set for 6/30/2014 08:30 AM in Courtroom A1001 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 8/19/13. (rebsec, )
|
|
Filing
116
MINUTE ORDER denying 115 Plaintiffs [sic] Request For Publication. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 8/12/13. (kfinn)
|
|
Filing
111
ORDER re 92 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [# 92 ] is ADOPTED IN PART and respectfully REJECTED IN PART. Plaintiffs' Request for Hearing and Oral Argument on the Parties& #039; Objections to Magistrate Recommendations[# 108 ] is denied. Plaintiffs' Partial Objection to Recommendation of United StatesMagistrate Judge [# 94 ] is SUSTAINED IN PART and OVERRULED IN PART. The objections stated by the defendant, the C ity and County of Denver, in its Objection in Part to Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [Docket No. 92 ] [# 96 ] are OVERRULED. The objections stated in Defendant Rodriguez's Objection in Part to United States Magistrate Judge� 39;s Recommendation [# 97 ] are OVERRULED. Defendant Rodriguez's Motion To Dismiss Substituted AmendedComplaint [# 66 ] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiffs' claims for violation of their rights to equal protection and to subst antive due process, insofar as that claim is based on the allegation of a special relationship between plaintiffs and Mr. Rodriguez, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The City and County of Denver's Motion To Dismiss [# 62 ] is GRANTED. The claim s of the plaintiffs against the City and County of Denver are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Judgment shall enter. Defendant, the City and County of Denver, is DROPPED as a named party to this action, and the case caption AMENDED accordingly. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 6/17/2013. (klyon, )
|
|
Filing
104
MINUTE ORDER denying 93 Plaintiffs' Limited Motion to the Magistrate (Judge) for Reconsideration of the Recommendation Regarding the Legal Standard Applicable to Conscious Shocking Conduct and the Relevant Time Frame. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 5/16/2013. (klyon, )
|
|
Filing
83
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Oral Argument Hearing held on 2/26/2013, taking under advisement the following motions: 62 Defendant City and County of Denver's Motion to Dismiss, and 66 Defendant Rodriguez' Motion to Dismiss Substituted Amended Complaint. FTR: C. Pearson -- Courtroom A-501. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 46 Defendants' Motion to Stay Discovery, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 2/4/2013. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
61
MINUTE ORDER denying as moot 45 Motion to Dismiss and denying as moot 47 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim as the Court finds good cause to accept Plaintiffs' Substituted First Amended Civil Rights Complaint with Request for T rial by Jury docket # 59 as filed. If Defendants choose to do so, they may re-file their respective motions on or before 1/7/2013, and may incorporate by reference the motions they filed previously. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 12/21/2012. (klyon, )
|
|
Filing
40
MINUTE ORDER granting 37 the Joint Motion to Vacate Scheduling Conference. The Scheduling Conference set for 12/10/2012 at 9:30 AM in Courtroom A501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty IS CONVERTED TO A STATUS CONFERENCE. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11/23/2012. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE re 23 Joint Motion For Settlement Conference With Magistrate Judge Michael Hegarty. This matter is REFERRED to the Honorable Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Colorado, who is authorized to convene and conduct a settlement conference in this matter. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 10/12/12. (kfinn, )
|
|
Filing
17
STIPULATE PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 9/27/2012. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
13
MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying without prejudice in part 6 Joint Motion to Stay to Engage in Settlement Negotiations. Status Conference set for 10/3/2012 09:45 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 9/25/12.(kfinn, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
