Perito v. Commissioner of Social Security, et al
| David Anthony Perito |
| Commissioner of Social Security and US. Social Security Administration |
| SSA Noticing |
| 1:2012cv02567 |
| September 27, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Adams |
| John L. Kane |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
ORDER granting 29 Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion for Approval of Attorney Fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). In accordance therewith, it is ORDERED that Defendant shall pay to Plaintiff reasonable attorney fees in the amount of $2,990.00, by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 1/29/2015.(evana, )
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER granting 27 the Stipulated Motion for an Award of Attorney Fees, by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 3/3/2014.(evana, )
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER that this case is REVERSED AND REMANDED to the Commissioner for further fact finding as directed in this Order pursuant to sentence four in 42 U.S.C.§ 405(g), by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 12/18/2013. (ervsl, )
|
|
Filing
17
Joint Case Management Plan. SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 2/25/2013. SS Defendants Brief due by 3/27/2013. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 4/11/2013, by Judge John L. Kane on 1/16/13. (sgrim)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER Drawing Case. ORDERED that this case shall be placed on the AP docket, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/1/12. (sgrim)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
