U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Van Gilder
| U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission |
| Michael Van Gilder |
| 1:2012cv02839 |
| October 26, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Denver |
| John L. Kane |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 Securities Exchange Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
115
ORDER granting 98 Motion to Amend Scheduling Order and Re-open Discovery. The parties are ORDERED to file a status reportregarding the scheduling and completion of this discovery on or before February 1, 2016. Signed by Judge John L. Kane on 12/21/15.(jhawk, )
|
|
Filing
114
MINUTE ENTRY for Motion Hearing proceedings held before Judge John L. Kane on 12/16/2015. Denying 85 Motion to Compel. Court Reporter: Darlene Martinez. (babia)
|
|
Filing
69
FINAL JUDGMENT re: 67 Final Judgment, Findings of Fact, and Conclusions of Law as to Defendant Michael Van Gilder and Relief Defendant Stephen Diltz. Entered by Clerk on 12/03/2014. (athom, )
|
|
Filing
62
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW RE CONSENT JUDGMENT by Judge John L. Kane on 07/17/14. (jhawk, )
|
|
Filing
53
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER Concerning Denial of Motion for Entry of Proposed Final Judgments. For the foregoing reasons the Proposed Settlements are REJECTED. The parties are free to submit new motions for entry of proposed findings of fact, con clusions of law and judgments, so long as they are consistent with the views expressed herein. Of course, the parties may instead forgo settlement and proceed to trial. If the latter, they shall file a scheduling and discovery order no later than May 16, 2014 by Judge John L. Kane on 04/24/14. (jhawk, )
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER denying 50 Motion for Judgment as to Defendant Michael Van Gilder and Relief Defendant Stephen Diltz by Judge John L. Kane on 04/01/14.(jhawk, )
|
|
Filing
44
Stipulated PROTECTIVE ORDER by Judge John L. Kane on 12/20/13. (jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
33
Notice to Counsel and Parties by Judge John L. Kane on 09/04/13. (jjhsl, ) Modified on 9/4/2013 to correct word (jjhsl, ).
|
|
Filing
21
MINUTE ORDER granting 20 Motion to Withdraw. Howard Glicksman is permitted to withdraw as counsel of record for defendant Michael Van Gilder, by Judge John L. Kane on 2/1/13.(sgrim)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Van Gilder | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission | |
| Represented By: | Thomas J. Krysa |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey Eric Oraker |
| Represented By: | James Albert Scoggins, II |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Michael Van Gilder | |
| Represented By: | Howard Jay Glicksman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
