Rhode v. Regis University

Plaintiff: James M. Rhode
Defendant: Regis University
Case Number: 1:2012cv02933
Filed: November 7, 2012
Court: Colorado District Court
Office: Denver Office
County: Adams
Presiding Judge: Christine M. Arguello
Referring Judge: Michael E. Hegarty
Nature of Suit: Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Labor
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 25, 2013 15 Opinion or Order of the Court MINUTE ORDER granting 13 Stipulated Motion for Entry of Protective Order by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 1/25/13.(dkals, )
January 25, 2013 16 Opinion or Order of the Court PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 1/25/13. (dkals, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rhode v. Regis University
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James M. Rhode
Represented By: Bryan E. Kuhn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Regis University
Represented By: Darin L. Mackender
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.