Bath v. RJM Acquisitions LLC et al
| Brian Edmond Bath |
| RJM Acquisitions LLC and Jamie Rozansky |
| 1:2012cv03228 |
| December 11, 2012 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Arapahoe |
| R. Brooke Jackson |
| Kathleen M. Tafoya |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
ORDER: Cases 12cv3225 and 12cv3228 have been voluntarily dismissed, and each party must bear his and its own costs and fees. by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 4/9/14. (jdyne, )
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER. It is ORDERED that the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (# 44 ) is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (# 38 ) is DENIED. It is ordered that the Bankruptcy Trustee in Bankruptcy Case No. 13-11630-M ER is given a reasonable time to ratify, join, or be substituted into this action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 17(a)(3). It is further ordered that the Clerk of Court shall send a copy of this Order to Counsel for the United States Trustee at the following address: Alan K. Motes, Trial Attorney for the U.S. Trustee, 999 18th Street, Suite 1551, Denver, CO 80202. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 07/01/13. (alvsl)
|
|
Filing
17
MINUTE ORDER. 11 Plaintiff's Motion in Support of Motion for Leave to File Amended Pleading is DENIED as moot. The Clerk shall file the Statement of Facts and Exhibits (Doc. Nos. 11-1 through 11-7) and docket the document as an Amended Com plaint and Exhibits. As "Defendants' Motion to Dismiss" (Doc. No. 9 , filed December 21, 2012) is directed at the now non-operative complaint, it is DENIED as moot. Defendants may answer or otherwise respond to the Amended Complai nt no later than March 5, 2013. It is unclear whether Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 12 , filed January 2, 2013) is directed at the now non-operative complaint or the Amended Complaint. Therefore, it is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff may refile his Motion for Summary Judgment directed at the Amended Complaint. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 02/15/13. (alvsl)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER denying 8 Motion to Remand to State Court. Plaintiff's Fair Credit Reporting Act claim invokes federal question jurisdiction because it arises under federal statutory law. Because such jurisdiction is clear from the face of Plaintiff's Complaint, and was asserted by Defendant in removing the case, federal subject-matter jurisdiction is established. Consequently, remand is inappropriate. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 01/07/13. (alvsl)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER Scheduling Conference set for 3/7/2013 10:15 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 12/18/2012. (kmtcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
