Dineen v. City and County of Denver et al
Deanna Dineen |
City and County of Denver and Career Service Authority/Career Service Board |
1:2012cv03282 |
December 17, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Denver |
R. Brooke Jackson |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 ORDER: The Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge # 21 is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss # 7 is GRANTED and the case is DISMISSED without prejudice. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 05/30/13. (alvsl) |
Filing 18 ORDER SETTING TRIAL AND TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE: This matter has been scheduled for a four-day jury trial on the docket of Judge R. Brooke Jackson in the U.S. District Courthouse, Courtroom A902, 9th Floor, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado, to commence on March 31, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. A Trial Preparation Conference is set for February 25, 2014 at 1:00 p.m. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 03/05/2013. (rbjsec. ) |
Filing 6 ORDER TO SET SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: The parties are ordered to set an initial scheduling conference in this Court (with Judge Jackson) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1 no later than 45 days after the answer, motion to dismiss or other response to the complaint is filed. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 12/20/2012. (rbjsec. ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.