Gerard, Jr. et al v. New Elk Coal Company, LLC et al
| Michael Cox and James Gerard, Jr. |
| Strategic Staffing Solutions and New Elk Coal Company, LLC |
| 1:2013cv00277 |
| February 1, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Mesa |
| William J. Martinez |
| Kathleen M. Tafoya |
| Labor: Other |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2101 Worker Adjustment and Retaining Notification Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
151
ORDER; All proceedings against Defendants Cline Mining Corporation and New Elk Coal Company, LLC, are STAYED unless and until relief from the automatic stay in Bankruptcy Case Nos. 14-26132EEB and 14-26133EEB is granted. Defendants Cline Mining Corporation and New Elk Coal Company, LLC, are ORDERED to file a status report in this case within ten days of any relief from stay in thebankruptcy case, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 1/5/15. (morti, )
|
|
Filing
93
COURTROOM MINUTES for Motion Hearing and Scheduling Conference held on 3/11/2014 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. ORDERED: Defendant New Elk is directed to produce Exhibit B as described by the parties in their papers, to the Plaintif f on or before March 10, 2014. The Court understands Exhibit B to be a settlement agreement. Therefore the document will be designated confidential and produced under the provisions of the protective order entered in the case. Plaintiff's Mot ion to Compel Discovery from Defendants New Elk Coal Company, LLC and Cline Mining Corporation and Extend the Phase One Discovery and Dispositive Motion Deadlines 80 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Further discovery is stayed, excluding t he completion of Phase 1 discovery and the completion of any discovery discussed herein, pending District Judge Moores resolution of the parties' summary judgment motions. Parties are directed to submit a Status Report within 5 days of Judge Moo re' s ruling stating the outcome of the ruling and further discovery requirements. The Proposed Scheduling Order is rejected at this time. FTR: S. Grimm - C201. (sgrim) Modified on 3/11/2014 to indicate a Scheduling Conference was also held.(sgrim)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER: The Court ORDERS that Plaintiff's "Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2)" (Doc. No. 53 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs may file their "First Amended Class Action Complaint" no later than October 4, 2013. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 10/01/13. (alvsl)
|
|
Filing
57
COURTROOM MINUTES for Motion Hearing held on 7/25/2013 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. ORDERED: Interested Party TK Mining Services LLCs Motion to Quash or Modify Subpoena 37 is DENIED AS MOOT. Defendant New Elk Coal Companys Motion for Protective Order and Objections to the Subpoena Served on Non-Party TK Mining Services, LLC 38 is DENIED AS MOOT. FTR: S. Grimm. (sgrim)
|
|
Filing
43
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 6/14/13. (sgrim)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER granting 38 Motion for Protective Order, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 6/12/13.(sgrim)
|
|
Filing
19
AMENDED ORDER Scheduling Conference set for 5/1/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 3/4/2013. (kmtcd)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER Scheduling Conference set for 5/9/2013 09:45 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 2/13/2013. (kmtcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
