Cantrell v. Gdowski et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|March 24, 2015
ORDER by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 3/24/15. ORDERED: Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 27] is GRANTED in part as indicated in this order. ORDERED: Ms. Cantrell's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims for violation of her First Amendment rights and violation of her Fourteenth Amendment procedural due process rights are DISMISSED with prejudice against all defendants. ORDERED: Ms. Cantrell's state law claims against Ms. Riccio for breach of contract, intentional inte rference with a contractual relationship, and wrongful discharge in violation of public policy are DISMISSED with prejudice. ORDERED: Ms. Cantrell's state law claims against Mr. Gdowski, Ms. Becker, and the district for breach of contract, inte ntional interference with a contractual relationship, and wrongful discharge in violation of public policy are DISMISSED without prejudice. ORDERED: Within 14 days of the entry of judgment, defendants may have their costs by filing a bill of costs with the Clerk of the Court. ORDERED: This case is dismissed in its entirety. (kpreu)
|May 16, 2014
ORDER granting 35 Defendants Motion to Stay Pending Immunity Determinations. The case is STAYED pending resolution of the Motion for Summary Judgment 27 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Final Pretrial Conference set for May 27, 2014 at 10:30 a.m. is VACATED. The Final Pretrial Conference will be reset, if needed, after resolution of the Motion for Summary Judgment, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 5/16/2014.(evana, )
|June 27, 2013
MINUTE ORDER granting 12 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. The Amended Complaint [#12-1] is accepted for filing as of the date of this Order. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 6/27/13.(mnfsl, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?