Sexton v. Hickenlooper et al
Plaintiff: John Thomas Sexton, Jr.
Defendant: John Hickenlooper, Michael Hancock and James Henning
Case Number: 1:2013cv01008
Filed: April 17, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Denver
Presiding Judge: Marcia S. Krieger
Presiding Judge: Kathleen M. Tafoya
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 123 JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff re: 122 Order on Report and Recommendations. Civil Case Terminated, entered by Clerk on 8/25/15. (pglov)
October 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 101 ORDER granting 79 Motion to Amend Complaint and Name Unknown Officer and Have Him Served with Complaint, and directing the United States Marshal Service to serve, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 10/15/14.(dkals, )
October 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 100 COURTROOM MINUTES for Motion Hearing held on 10/9/2014 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. ORDERED: Denver Defendants' Motion to Compel, Motion to Modify Scheduling Order and Request for Expedited Ruling 96 is GRANTED IN PART AND D ENIED IN PART. The discovery cut off is extended to November 10, 2014 for the limited purpose of deposing the Plaintiff. Plaintiff is ordered to appear in Denver, CO for the deposition on November 7, 2014. Defendants will provide a Notice of Deposition to Plaintiff. The Dispositive Motions deadline is extended to December 10, 2014. FTR: KMT C201. (sgrim)
September 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 91 MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiff's Motion to Correct Previous Motion to Amend Dated August 15, 2014 89 is DENIED without prejudice to Plaintiff refiling a motion to amend his complaint to add a request for attorney's fees if and when he obtains counsel to represent him in this action, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 9/3/14.(sgrim)
May 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 78 MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 76 Motion to Amend Complaint and Name Unknown Officer and Have Him Served with Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 5/19/14.(sgrim)
May 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 75 TRIAL PREPARATION ORDER - CIVIL by Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 5/13/14. (msksec, )
March 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER setting Scheduling Conference/Planning Meeting for 5/13/2014 at 9:45 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 3/26/2014. (klyon, )
March 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 56 OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS: The Court ADOPTS the Recommendation 54 that Defendants Hickenlooper, Hancock, and Henning's Motions to Dismiss 20 , 24 be GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. All claims against Defendants Hickenlooper and Hancock, except the First Amendment claim, are dismissed. As to Defendant Henning, no claims are dismissed but for the state law tort claims. by Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 3/18/14.(msksec, )
October 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER granting 49 Motion to Stay. All discovery in this matter is hereby STAYED and the Scheduling Conference will not be reset at this time. The parties shall file a Joint Status Report within seven days of a ruling on Defendants motions to dismiss, if any portion of the case remains pending, to advise if the Scheduling Conference should be reset. by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 10/1/2013.(trlee, )
June 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 32 MINUTE ORDER denying 28 Motion to Name Unknown Party. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 6/27/2013. (klyon, )
May 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER Setting Preliminary Scheduling Conference for 8/12/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 5/14/13. (sgrim)
April 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER Drawing Case. This case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 04/22/13. (nmmsl, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sexton v. Hickenlooper et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Thomas Sexton, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Hickenlooper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Hancock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Henning
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?