CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Mark VII, LLC

Justia Dockets & Filings Tenth Circuit Colorado District Court CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Mark VII, LLC

CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Mark VII, LLC

Plaintiff:	CSX Transportation, Inc.
Defendant:	Mark VII, LLC
Case Number:	1:2013cv01932
Filed:	July 19, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office:	Denver Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	Lewis T. Babcock
Nature of Suit:	Commerce ICC Rates, Etc.
Cause of Action:	49 U.S.C. § 10101 Rail Transportation
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 30, 2013	Filing 9 DEFAULT JUDGMENT by Clerk in favor of CSX Transportation, Inc. against Mark VII, LLC re: 8 Order on Motion for Default Judgment. FURTHER ORDERED that default judgment is hereby entered in favor ofPlaintiff, CSX Transportation, Inc., and against Defendant, Mark VII, LLC, pursuant toFed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(1), in the amount of $95,649.00, and that plaintiffs Complaint and this civil action are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is FURTHER ORDERED that post-judgment interest shall accrue at the legal rate of 0.14% pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961, from the date of entry of judgment. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff, CSX Transportation, Inc., shall have its costs by the filing of a Bill of Costs with the Clerk of this Court within fourteen days of the ntry of judgment, and in accordance with the procedures set forth in Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1., by Edward P. Butler, Deputy Clerk on 8/30/2013. (ervsl, )

Date Filed

Document Text

August 30, 2013

Filing 9 DEFAULT JUDGMENT by Clerk in favor of CSX Transportation, Inc. against Mark VII, LLC re: 8 Order on Motion for Default Judgment. FURTHER ORDERED that default judgment is hereby entered in favor ofPlaintiff, CSX Transportation, Inc., and against Defendant, Mark VII, LLC, pursuant toFed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(1), in the amount of $95,649.00, and that plaintiffs Complaint and this civil action are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is FURTHER ORDERED that post-judgment interest shall accrue at the legal rate of 0.14% pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961, from the date of entry of judgment. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff, CSX Transportation, Inc., shall have its costs by the filing of a Bill of Costs with the Clerk of this Court within fourteen days of the ntry of judgment, and in accordance with the procedures set forth in Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1., by Edward P. Butler, Deputy Clerk on 8/30/2013. (ervsl, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Mark VII, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: CSX Transportation, Inc.
Represented By:	Jeffrey D. Cohen
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Mark VII, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?