Bethel v. Colvin
Stephen Bethel |
Carolyn W. Colvin |
SSA Noticing |
1:2013cv02044 |
August 1, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Denver |
John L. Kane |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 206 Social Security Benefits |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 ORDER granting 21 Motion for Attorney Fees. Defendant is directed to pay toPlaintiff's counsel, Paul Radosevich, attorney fees in the amount of $12,720.22. Upon payment of this fee, Mr. Radosevich is DIRECTED to refund the previously approved EAJA fee amount of $7,500.00 to his client, Mr. Bethel, pursuant to Gisbrect v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 122 S. Ct. 1817 (2002). By Judge William J. Martinez on 04/24/2015. (athom, ) |
Filing 20 ORDER granting 19 the Parties Motion for Order Approving Stipulation of Award of Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act, by Judge William J. Martinez on 7/22/2014.(evana, ) |
Filing 18 FINAL JUDGMENT. re: 17 Order Vacating Administrative Law Judge's Decision And Remanding To The Commissioner For Rehearing, by Deborah Hansen, Deputy Clerk on 7/1/2014. (dhans, ) |
Filing 17 ORDER the Commissioners decision is REVERSED and this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for rehearing, by Judge William J. Martinez on 6/30/2014. (evana, ) |
Filing 9 JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN (ORDER). SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 12/2/2013. SS Defendants Brief due by 1/2/2014. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 1/17/2014. By Judge John L. Kane on 10/18/13. (mnfsl, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.