Banks v. Colorado Dept. of Corrections et al
| Torrey V. Banks |
| State of Colorado, A. Medina, C. Soares, R. Wager, A. DeCesaro, J. Brock, Lee H., M. Griffith, D. Canfield, R. Richardson, S. Foster, T. Meeks, Katzenmeyer, Quattlebaum, Arguello, Lawson, Anderson, Wil, Barr, Jaros, Yard, Brown, Ortiz, Brandt, Chavez, J. Scollard, S. Englar, Crosley, Maes, Dundes, Estrada, Malebranche, R. Johnson, L. Lewis and J. McCall |
| 1:2013cv02599 |
| September 20, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Fremont |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Prisoner - Prison Condition (U.S. not a defendant) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 7/22/15. Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgement [sic]/Reconsideration/Reargument [sic] Rule (59) Fed. [C]iv. R # 69 and Plaintiff's Motion for Relief from Judgment Rule 60 Fed.R.civ.P. [sic]# 83 are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions # 74 , # 80 # 81 are DENIED.(lgale, )
|
|
Filing
61
FINAL JUDGMENT by Clerk in favor of Arguello, Crosley, Katzenmeyer, Malebranche, Quattlebaum, C. Soares, Jerri Scollard, Stephanie Englar against Torrey V. Banks re: 60 Order on Motion to Dismiss, on 3/4/15. (morti, )
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 1/8/15. Motion to Reconsider Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 60 [#47] is DENIED.(lgale, )
|
|
Filing
54
MINUTE ORDER re Document Motion 41 and the Subpoena Motion 45 are DENIED without prejudice as premature; denying 42 Default Motion, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 11/24/2014.(slibi, )
|
|
Filing
40
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 8/21/14. Motion to Amend/Alter Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e)[,] 60(b) & 54 and/or Notice of Appeal [#31] is DENIED without prejudice. Motion Requesting a Ruling on Previous Motion Submitted on 6-11-14 ECF(24) & ECF(25) [#36] is DENIED as moot. (lgale)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER to Dismiss In Part and to Draw Case to a Presiding Judge. The claims asserted against the Colorado Department of Corrections, Warden A. Medina, and Assistant Warden R. Wager are dismissed. Remaining claims and the case are drawn to a presiding judge and, if appropriate, to a magistrate judge. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 5/7/2014. (klyon, )
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Third and Final Amended Complaint; denying as unnecessary 12 Motion to Omit Sections (Paragraphs) 13, 14, 15 from the Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/30/2014.(slibi, )
|
|
Filing
18
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 01/27/14 granting in part and denying in part 17 Motion to Show Cause/Status. To the extent Plaintiff is asking when the Court will rule on his case, the motion is GRANTED. The Court will rule o n Mr. Banks case in due course. To the extent Plaintiffs motion for a case status is a request for a free copy of the docket sheet in this action, the request is DENIED. Plaintiff may obtain copies of the docket sheet and electronic documents filed in this action at a cost of $.50 per page paid in advance.(nmarb, )
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER Directing Plaintiff To File Second Amended Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/23/13. (nmmsl, )
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER Directing Plaintiff To Cure Deficiencies, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/09/13. (nmmsl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
