RE/MAX Relocation, Inc. v. Valero Services, Inc.
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|October 1, 2014
ORDER Approving Stipulated 29 Notice of Settlement : Defendant's deadline to respond to Plaintiff's pending Motion for Attorney's Fees and Costs is hereby VACATED re 28 (terminated), Parties are ordered to submit proper dismissal papers pursuant to the terms of their settlement by October 14, 2014, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 10/1/2014. (jsmit)
|August 26, 2014
MEMORANDUM, OPINION And Order: Plaintiff RMR's Motion for Summary Judgment [ 15] is granted as to Defendant Valero's liability for breach of the Agreement; Defendant Valero's Motion for Summary Judgment 18 is denied; and on or before September 15, 2014 RMR will move for an award of the attorneys' fees and costs it incurred in defending the California Litigation and in bringing this action against Valero. RMRs motion for attorneys' fees must comply withLocal Civil Rule 54.3. Valero will have up to and including October 6, 2014 to respond, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 8/26/2014. (jsmit)
|January 28, 2014
ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 3/20/2014 at 10:30 AM in Conference Room, proposed order (original only) on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on March 13, 2014, lead counsel present in person, initial disclosures under Rule 26(a)(1) will be completed no later than 10 calendar days before the scheduling conference, and counsel shall file their respective disclosure statements pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 1/28/2014. (rpmcd )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?