Barber v. Crimson Resource Management Corp. et al
Plaintiff: Philip E. Barber
Defendant: Crimson Resource Management Corp. and Gary L. Buntmann
Counter_claimant: Crimson Resource Management Corp.
Counter_defendant: Philip E. Barber
Case Number: 1:2014cv00662
Filed: March 3, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: Richard P. Matsch
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice, each party to bear their own costs and attorneys' fees, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 6/11/2014. (jsmit)
May 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER Granting 26 Motion to Stay: up to and including June 23, 2014. All deadlines in this action shall be stayed for the duration of the stay, and Defendant shall have up to and including June 24, 2014 to respond to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand and Amended Complaint, and up to and including June 30, 2014 to respond to Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 5/8/2014.(jsmit)
April 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER Granting 20 Motion to Dismiss Party Party Gary L. Buntmann (and Current and Former Members of the Board of Directors of Crimson Resource Management Corp.) are DISMISSED without prejudice and each side shall bear its own costs and attorneys fees, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 4/25/2014.(jsmit)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barber v. Crimson Resource Management Corp. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Crimson Resource Management Corp.
Represented By: Christopher Stephen Mills
Represented By: Ericka F. Houck Englert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gary L. Buntmann
Represented By: Ericka F. Houck Englert
Represented By: Christopher Stephen Mills
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Philip E. Barber
Represented By: Sybil Ruth Kisken
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: Crimson Resource Management Corp.
Represented By: Ericka F. Houck Englert
Represented By: Christopher Stephen Mills
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: Philip E. Barber
Represented By: Sybil Ruth Kisken
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?