Daniel v. Steiner
Plaintiff: Arlus Daniel, Jr.
Defendant: Steiner
Case Number: 1:2014cv00834
Filed: March 21, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Larimer
Presiding Judge: Boyd N. Boland
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER affirming and adopting 61 Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Wang. Granting 51 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Defendant Lieutenant Mason is dismissed pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.1 for Plaintiff's failure to pr operly serve him in compliance with Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, failure to comply with the Court's repeated orders, and for failure to prosecute. This case is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety, by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 11/30/2015. (ebuch)
June 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 60 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 6/30/15 granting 54 Motion to Stay. IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Stay is GRANTED pending the court'sresolution of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. (bsimm, )
May 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 59 MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang: Due to the lack of presence on behalf of the Plaintiff, the Scheduling Conference is converted to a Status Conference. Status Conference held on 5/29/2015. Court enters an order GRANTING 55 Motion to Vacate Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference. FTR: Wang-am. (nmarb, )
April 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 4/17/15. Scheduling Conference set for 5/29/2015 10:00 AM in Courtroom C205 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. (bsimm, )
October 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER re: 22 Proposed Amended Complaint filed by Arlus Daniel, Jr. The Second Amended Complaint [Doc. # 22 ] is accepted for filing. The plaintiff must file proof of service on all defendants on or before 2/25/2015. No further extensions of time will be granted and the plaintiff may not seek leave to amend the complaint in lieu of completing service against the defendants. Failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of this action. Dismissal of the this action may result in an expiration of the applicable statute of limitation and bar recovery. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/28/2014. (athom, )
October 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER. The plaintiff's attempt to amend his Complaint is DENIED WITHOUTPREJUDICE, and the Amended Petition [Doc. # 16 ] is not accepted. The Motion for Service [Doc. # 17 ] is DENIED. The Petition for Damages in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 & E xtension of Time [Doc. # 18 ] is STRICKEN. The plaintiff shall serve defendant Steiner with a summons and a copy of the initial Complaint and file proof of that service on or before 10/20/2014. Failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of this case. Dismissal may result in an expiration of the applicable statute of limitation and bar re-filing of the complaint. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/09/2014. (athom, )
May 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: On or before 7/21/2014, plaintiff shall serve defendant Steiner and file proof of that service. To the extent the plaintiff requests injunctive relief, the request is denied. The plaintiff's attempts to amend the complaint are denied without prejudice. Any future attempts to amend the complaint must comply with this Order. Failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal of the complaint, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 5/21/2014. (eseam)
April 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/2/14. IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff shall serve defendant Steiner with a summons and a copy of the Complaint and file proof of that service on or before July 21, 2014. (bsimm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Daniel v. Steiner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arlus Daniel, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steiner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?