Puma Investments, LLC v. Great Lakes Reinsurance (UK) PLC
Plaintiff: Puma Investments, LLC
Defendant: Great Lakes Reinsurance (UK) PLC
Case Number: 1:2014cv00856
Filed: March 24, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: El Paso
Presiding Judge: Kristen L. Mix
Presiding Judge: Raymond P. Moore
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER dismissing case with prejudice, re: 17 Motion to Dismiss, by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 9/11/2014.(trlee, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Puma Investments, LLC v. Great Lakes Reinsurance (UK) PLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Puma Investments, LLC
Represented By: Garry R. Appel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Great Lakes Reinsurance (UK) PLC
Represented By: Mark Rodman Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?