Marquez v. Line et al
Petitioner: Anthony Marquez
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The and Rick Line
Case Number: 1:2014cv01313
Filed: May 9, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Crowley
Presiding Judge: Boyd N. Boland
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER denying without prejudice 26 Motion for Leave to Appeal in Forma Pauperis re 25 Notice of Appeal. A new motion may be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. The 27 Application for Certificate of Appealability is denied. By Judge William J. Martinez on 1/13/2015.(alowe)
December 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 24 FINAL JUDGMENT by Clerk re: 23 Order Denying Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus. This case is dismissed with prejudice. By Clerk on 12/15/2014. (alowe)
December 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER DENYING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS: The Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (ECF No. 1 ) is denied and this case is dismissed with prejudice. It is further ORDERED that there is no basis on which to issue a certificate of appealability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). By Judge William J. Martinez on 12/12/2014. (alowe)
August 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER to Dismiss in Part, it is ORDERED that claim 3 in the Application is DISMISSED as moot and claim 5 in the Application is DISMISSED for failure to present a federal constitutional issue. It is FURTHER ORDERED that claims 1 and 4 in the App lication are DISMISSED because the claims are unexhausted and procedurally barred. It is FURTHER ORDERED that within thirty days Respondents are directed to file an answer in compliance with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases that fully addresses the merits of the remaining claim. It is FURTHER ORDERED that within thirty days of the filing of the answer Applicant may file a reply, if he desires, by Judge William J. Martinez on 8/12/2014. (evana, )
August 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER Drawing Case; This case shall be drawn to a presiding judge and, if applicable, to a magistrate judge, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 8/11/14. (morti, )
June 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER To File Pre-Answer Response, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 6/20/14. (morti, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marquez v. Line et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Rick Line
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Anthony Marquez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?