Burns et al v. Hickenlooper et al
Catherine Burns, Sheila Schroeder, Mark Thrun, Geoffrey Bateman, Rachel Catt, Cassie Rubald, Breanna Alexander, Stacy Parrish, Angela Cranmore, Julianne Deloy, Karen Collier and Denise Lord |
John W. Hickenlooper, Jr., John Suthers and Pam Anderson |
1:2014cv01817 |
July 1, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Arapahoe |
Kristen L. Mix |
Raymond P. Moore |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 75 ORDER denying as moot 68 Motion for Attorney Fees. That the parties' Stipulation for Dismissal 74 is GRANTED. The above-captioned matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 1/28/2015.(tscha, ) |
Filing 63 ORDER granting 62 Defendants Joint, Unopposed Motion to Make Preliminary Injunction Permanent; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendant John W. Hickenlooper, Jr., in hi s official capacity as Governor of Colorado; John Suthers, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Colorado; and Pam Anderson, in her official capacity as Clerk and Recorder for Jefferson County; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs a re awarded costs and shall within 14 days of the date of this Order file a bill of costs, in accordance with the procedures under Fed.R.Civ.P.54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1, which shall be taxed by the Clerk of Court. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 10/17/2014.(evana, ) |
Filing 45 ORDER that Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction ECF No. 8 is GRANTED and Defendants are hereby ENJOINED from enforcing or applying Article II, Section 31 of the Colorado Constitution and C.R.S. §§ 14-2-104(1)(b) and 14-2-104(2) as a basis to deny marriage to same-sex couples or to deny recognition of otherwise valid same-sex marriages entered in other states; and FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Stay Proceedings and Non- Opposition to Proposed Preliminary Injunct ion ECF No. 16 is DENIED as to their request to stay the preliminary injunction but GRANTED as to a stay of all other proceedings in this case until three (3) days after the final mandate is issued in Kitchen v. Herbert, No. 13-4178, __ F.3d __, 2014 WL 2868044 (10th Cir. June 25, 2014), or further order of this Court; and FURTHER ORDERED that the preliminary injunction is TEMPORARILY STAYED until 8:00 a.m. on Monday, August 25, 2014, to allow Defendants time to seek relief from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit or the Supreme Court. by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 7/23/2014.(evana, ) |
Filing 43 COURTROOM MINUTES for proceedings held before Judge Raymond P. Moore: Motion Hearing held on 7/22/2014, taking under advisement 16 Defendants' Motion to Stay and Non-Opposition to Proposed Preliminary Injunction. Court Reporter: Tammy Hoffschildt. (cpear) |
Filing 38 COURTROOM MINUTES for proceedings held before Judge Raymond P. Moore: Status Conference held on 7/15/2014, granting 20 Unopposed Motion for Expedited Status Conference, and granting 33 Plaintiffs' Partially Unopposed Motion to Dismiss. Def endant Debra Johnson (in her official capacity as Clerk and Recorder for the City and County of Denver) is terminated. 19 Defendant Debra Johnson's Joinder in Motion to Stay Proceedings and Non-opposition to Stipulated Preliminary Injunction is deemed moot. Motion Hearing set for 7/22/2014 at 1:30 PM in Courtroom A 601 before Judge Raymond P. Moore on 16 Defendants' Motion to Stay Proceedings. Court Reporter: Tammy Hofffschildt. (cpear) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.