Joe Hand Promotions Inc. v. Poarch et al
Plaintiff: Joe Hand Promotions Inc.
Defendant: Andrew Clark Poarch and Lazy Lion, LLC, The
Case Number: 1:2014cv02100
Filed: July 29, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Watanabe
Nature of Suit: Cable/Satellite TV
Cause of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 0553
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER OF JUDGMENT. ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant Andrew Clark Poarch in the amount of $5,000.00 for statutory damages pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 605(e)(3)(C)(i)(II), because $5,000 is a reaso nable amount and Defendant Poarchs business, Lazy Lion, LLC, appears to be a profitable business. It is FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant Andrew Clark Poarch in the amount $20,000.00 for statuto ry damages pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 605(e)(3)(C)(ii), because it is a reasonable amount and Plaintiff broadcasted the willfully intercepted Ultimate Fighting Championship to all of its members at the Lazy Lion, LLC. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Pl aintiff is entitled to reasonable attorneys fees and is, therefore, permitted to submit within fourteen days of the entry of judgment a motion and supporting documentation for reasonable attorneys fees. Such motion shall comply with the requirements set forth in Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(2) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.3. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have its costs by the filling of a Bill of Costs with the Clerk of the Court within ten days of the entry of judgment. It is FURTHER ORDERED tha t post-judgment interest shall accrue at the weekly rate established under 28 U.S.C. § 1961 from the date of entry of judgment. Finally, it is FURTHER ORDERED that this case is CLOSED IN ITS ENTIRETY. SO ORDERED BY Judge Christine M. Arguello on 2/27/2015. Text Only Entry(shart)
July 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE AND SETTING DEADLINE FOR FILING OF PILOT PROGRAM CONSENT FORM. On or before 9/16/2014, parties shall complete and file the Pilot Program Consent Form 4 . Scheduling Conference set for 9/30/2014 09:30 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe. Consent Form due by 9/16/2014. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 7/29/2014. (emill)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Joe Hand Promotions Inc. v. Poarch et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joe Hand Promotions Inc.
Represented By: Ryan Richard Janis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Clark Poarch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lazy Lion, LLC, The
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?