Mingo v. Raemisch et al
| Bruce Mingo |
| Rick Raemisch and John Suthers |
| 1:2014cv03282 |
| December 3, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Crowley |
| Gordon P. Gallagher |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
MINUTE ORDER denying 43 Motion for Certificate of Appealability by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 4/25/16.(jdyne, )
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER Denying 1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 3/8/16. (jdyne, )
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER granting 22 Motion for Supplemental Order for State Exhibits; granting 23 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond Rick Raemisch answer due 6/5/2015, John Suthers answer due 6/5/2015; granting 24 Motion for Extension of Time to File State Record. by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 5/6/15.(jdyne, )
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER: within thirty days Respondents are directed to file an answer, Applicant may file a reply; Claim Two is dismissed; Respondents shall file with the Clerk copy of the complete record of Court Case No. 98CR2673. by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 4/6/15. (jdyne, )
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER Drawing Case. This case shall be drawn to a presiding judge and, if applicable, to a magistrate judge, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 3/09/2015. (slibi, )
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER to File Pre-Answer Response, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 12/04/2014. (slibi, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
