Makeen v. State of Colorado, The et al
Akeem Makeen |
State of Colorado, The, Charla Branham, Arapahoe County and Janel Bravo |
1:2014cv03452 |
December 23, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Denver |
Christine M. Arguello |
Craig B. Shaffer |
Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 129 ORDER Adopting and Affirming 123 December 18, 2015 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff's Corrected Verified Petition and Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue (Doc. # 60 ) and Plaintiff's Verified Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue (Doc. # 103 ) are DENIED. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 01/05/2016. (athom, ) |
Filing 120 COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: Motion Hearing held on 12/17/2015.Finding as moot 43 Motion to Dismiss. Denying without prejudice 54 Motion for Summary Judgment. Finding as moot 93 Motion for Leave. Granting 114 Motion for Leave. Granting 115 Motion to Amend/Correct/Modify. Doc. 115 is deemed as filed today. FTR: Courtroom A-402. (amont, ) |
Filing 92 COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: Motion Hearing held on 5/5/2015. Denying 78 Motion to Strike. Withdrawing without prejudice 84 Motion for Leave. Finding as moot 24 Motion for TRO. FTR: Courtroom A-402. (amont, ) |
Filing 87 ORDER granting 82 Motion to Quash Subpoena to the extent that Plaintiff seeks to have Ms. McCandless testify as an expert witness. Plaintiff may call Ms. McCandless as a fact witness only; however, her testimony must be relevant to the issues in this case. By Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 04/29/2015. (cbslc2) |
Filing 62 ORDER granting 58 Motion to Dismiss Party. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Arapahoe County, Board of County Commissioners, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, the parties to pay their own fees and costs. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 03/30/2015. (athom, ) |
Filing 50 MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: Status Conference held on 3/17/2015. Granting 26 Motion for Hearing/Conference. Withdrawing 35 Motion for Leave. Granting 20 Motion for Order. The second amended complaint [20-1] is deemed as filed today. Finding as moot 33 Motion for Leave. Plaintiff's response to 43 Motion to Dismiss due April 7, 2015. Motion Hearing set for 4/16/2015 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer for 24 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order VERIFIED PETITION AND APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. Plaintiff's supplemental brief due March 18, 2015, response due March 30, 2015, and reply due April 7, 2015. Court Reporter: Janet Coppock. FTR: Courtroom A-402. (amont) |
Filing 49 ORDER denying 41 Motion for Reconsideration. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 03/11/2015. (athom, ) |
Filing 12 ORDER Drawing Case. This case shall be drawn to a presiding judge, and when applicable to a magistrate judge, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 1/10/2015. (slibi, ) |
Filing 8 ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiencies; 5 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint is denied as unnecessary pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1), by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 1/8/15.(morti, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.