K.B. v. Perez et al
Plaintiff: K. B.
Defendant: Christopher J. Perez and Walter Vanni
Case Number: 1:2014cv03514
Filed: December 31, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Arapahoe
Presiding Judge: Boyd N. Boland
Presiding Judge: William P Johnson
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 46 FINAL JUDGMENT re: 45 Order on Motion to Dismiss in favor of Christopher J. Perez against K. B. Signed by Clerk on 04/01/2016. (athom, )
February 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 40 Unopposed Motion to Reset March 18, 2016 Hearing. The Motion Hearing re 29 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint is rescheduled for 3/22/2016 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 702 before William P Johnson. Signed by William P Johnson on 02/02/2016. (athom, )
August 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER granting 24 Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. By William P Johnson on 08/06/2015. (athom, )
July 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 7/20/15. A Scheduling Conference is set for 8/28/2015 09:30 AM in Courtroom C204 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. The parties shall submit their proposed scheduling order, including a copy of the proposed scheduling order in a Word format sent via email to Wang_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov, seven days prior to the Scheduling Conference. (bsimm, )
July 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 7/16/15. The Order to Show Cause 16 is hereby DISCHARGED; Pursuant to the Stipulation 20 , Defendant Perez shall file an Answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint on or before 8/7/2015; and The Clerk of Court is instructed to amend the docket to reflect that Walter Vanni has been dismissed from this action. (bsimm, )
January 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER the First Claim for equitable relief is hereby dismissed. The Second Claim may proceed, but that the undersigned recuses himself from this matter going forward and that the Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to confer with the Chief Judge f or determination as to whether to reassign the case to another District Judge of this District, to arrange for a visiting judge to be assigned this matter, or for such other instruction as she deems appropriate. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 1/8/2015. (tscha, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: K.B. v. Perez et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: K. B.
Represented By: Alison Lee Ruttenberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christopher J. Perez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walter Vanni
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?