McCoy v. Colorado Springs Police Dept. et al
| Leila McCoy |
| Colorado Springs Police Dept., Richardson, (I) Richardson, Parks, (I) Parks, Ledbetter and (I) Ledbetter |
| 1:2015cv00018 |
| January 5, 2015 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| El Paso |
| Gordon P. Gallagher |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDER dismissing this action without prejudice, and denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 4/7/15. (dkals, )
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 03/06/15, To Amend Complaint, and denying 9 Motion for Reasonable Accommodation, with leave to refile as needed at a later date. The Clerk of the Court is to send to Plaintiff two copies of the Court-approved Complaint form to be used in filing an Amended Complaint. Ms. McCoy only needs to submit one copy to the Court for the purpose of filing.(nmarb, )
|
|
Filing
8
MINUTE ORDER denying as improperly submitted 5 Motion to Add a Claim; and denying as an improper request 7 Motion for Permission for Electronic Case Filing, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 01/15/15.(nmarb, )
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER Directing Plaintiff To Cure Deficiencies, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 01/06/15. (nmarb, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
