Atkins v. HCA-Healthone, LLC
| Bethany Atkins |
| HCA-Healthone, LLC |
| 1:2015cv00037 |
| January 6, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Denver |
| Wiley Y. Daniel |
| Kristen L. Mix |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
ORDER DISMISSING CASE that the Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice ECF No. 47 is APPROVED. This matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to bear its own fees and costs, by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 2/11/2016. (evana, )
|
|
Filing
45
Stipulated Order, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 10/9/15. (morti, )
|
|
Filing
41
MINUTE ORDER; 39 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to File SecondAmended Complaint and Jury Demand is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file her Second Amended Complaint on or before October 9, 2015.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond tothe Second Amended Complaint in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(3), by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 10/1/15.(morti, )
|
|
Filing
38
Stipulated PROTECTIVE ORDER Concerning Confidential Information, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 9/29/15. (morti, )
|
|
Filing
25
MINUTE ORDER re: 16 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint and Jury Demand (the "Motion") and Defendants Status Report Regarding Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint and Jury Demand (Docket #16) 24 (the Status Report). The Motion 16 is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall accept PlaintiffsAmended Complaint and Jury Demand [16-1] for filing as of June 17, 2015, the date the Status Report 24 was filed. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(3), by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 6/18/15.(morti, )
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER granting 13 Plaintiffs Motion to Reopen Case for Good Cause, by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 5/11/2015.(evana, )
|
|
Filing
12
MINUTE ORDER Striking 11 Plaintiffs Motion to Reopen Case for Good Cause for failure to comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1., by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 5/7/2015.(evana, )
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER ADOPTING AND AFFIRMING 9 RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The 4 Motion for Administrative Closure or, in the Alternative, Motion to Stay Proceedings is GRANTED, and this case is administratively closed pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2. By Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 3/19/2015.(alowe)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Atkins v. HCA-Healthone, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Bethany Atkins | |
| Represented By: | Laura Ellen Schwartz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: HCA-Healthone, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Lisa A. Hogan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
