Watson v. UPS Ground Freight, Inc., et al
| Dennis Watson |
| UPS Ground Freight, Inc., Robert Mangione, John Gonzales and Kenneth Thomas |
| 1:2015cv00774 |
| April 13, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Arapahoe |
| Gordon P. Gallagher |
| Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
67
Final JUDGMENT by Clerk in favor of UPS Ground Freight, Inc. against Dennis Watson on 5/03/2016. (slibi, )
|
|
Filing
63
MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang: Motion Hearing held on 2/26/2016. ORDERED: taking under advisement 54 Motion to Dismiss 2nd Complaint; and GRANTNG 61 Motion For Leave to Submit Supplemental Authority. The supplemental authority [61-1] and [61-2] is accepted as tendered. Hearing concluded. FTR: C204-am. (nmarb, )
|
|
Filing
57
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 01/13/16 granting in part and denying in part 55 Motion to Dismiss Individual Defendants and Amend Case Caption. The Clerk of the Court is directed to amend the case caption to remove Robert Mangione, Kenneth Thomas, and John Gonzales as Defendants,leaving only UPS Ground Freight, Inc. as a Defendant in this action.(nmarb, )
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER: Civil Practice Standards of Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 1/7/16. (nywlc1)
|
|
Filing
53
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 12/28/15. (bsimm, )
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER Setting Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference for 12/15/2015 11:00 AM in Courtroom C204 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang, by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 11/27/2015. (slibi, )
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 11/25/15. The Order is Show Cause 43 is DISCHARGED. Counsel is specifically advised that they must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules of Civil Practice, and all orders of this court. Failure to do so in the future may result in the sua sponte striking of filings and/or other sanctions, including dismissal if warranted. (bsimm, )
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 9/15/15. A Scheduling Conference sis et for 10/13/2015 10:00 AM in Courtroom C204 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. The parties shall submit their proposed scheduling order, including a copy of the proposed scheduling order in a Word format sent via email to Wang_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov, seven days prior to the Scheduling Conference. (bsimm, )
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE AND SETTING DEADLINE FOR FILING OF PILOT PROGRAM CONSENT FORM by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 8/4/15. A Scheduling Conference set for 9/17/2015 03:30 PM in Courtroom C204 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y . Wang. The parties shall complete and file the Pilot Program Consent Form on or before 9/10/2015. The parties shall submit their proposed scheduling order, including a copy of the proposed scheduling order in a Word format sent via email to Wang_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov, seven days prior to the Scheduling Conference. (bsimm, )
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER Drawing Case by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 7/18/15. (dkals, )
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiencies, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 5/2/15. (morti, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
